Pathol. Oncol. Res., 11 May 2022

NTRK Fusions in a Sarcomas Series: Pathology, Molecular and Clinical Aspects

www.frontiersin.orgVasiliki Siozopoulou1,2*, www.frontiersin.orgElly Marcq2, www.frontiersin.orgKoen De Winne1, www.frontiersin.orgKoen Norga3, www.frontiersin.orgGertjan Schmitz4, www.frontiersin.orgValerie Duwel5, www.frontiersin.orgPhilippe Delvenne6, www.frontiersin.orgEvelien Smits2,7 and www.frontiersin.orgPatrick Pauwels1,2
  • 1Department of Pathology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
  • 2Center for Oncological Research (CORE), Integrated Personalized and Precision Oncology Network (IPPON), University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
  • 3Department of Pediatrics, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
  • 4Department of Orthopaedics, Hospital of Klina, Antwerp, Belgium
  • 5Department of Pathology, Hospital of Klina, Antwerp, Belgium
  • 6Department of Anatomopathology, CHU Sart Tilman, Liège, Belgium
  • 7Center for Cell Therapy and Regenerative Medicine, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium

Targeting molecular alterations has been proven to be an inflecting point in tumor treatment. Especially in recent years, inhibitors that target the tyrosine receptor kinase show excellent response rates and durable effects in all kind of tumors that harbor fusions of one of the three neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase genes (NTRK1, NTRK2 and NTRK3). Today, the therapeutic options in most metastatic sarcomas are rather limited. Therefore, identifying which sarcoma types are more likely to harbor these targetable NTRK fusions is of paramount importance. At the moment, identification of these fusions is solely based on immunohistochemistry and confirmed by molecular techniques. However, a first attempt has been made to describe the histomorphology of NTRK-fusion positive sarcomas, in order to pinpoint which of these tumors are the best candidates for testing. In this study, we investigate the immunohistochemical expression of pan-TRK in 70 soft tissue and bone sarcomas. The pan-TRK positive cases were further investigated with molecular techniques for the presence of a NTRK fusion. Seven out of the 70 cases showed positivity for pan-TRK, whereas two of these seven cases presented an NTRK3 fusion. Further analysis of the fused sarcomas revealed some unique histological, molecular and clinical findings. The goal of this study is to expand the histomorphological spectrum of the NTRK-fused sarcomas, to identify their fusion partners and to correlate these parameters with the clinical outcome of the disease. In addition, we evaluated the immunohistochemical expression pattern of the pan-TRK and its correlation with the involved NTRK gene.


Soft tissue and bone tumors are a very heterogenous group of neoplasms which makes prognosis difficult to assess. Moreover, given their rarity of occurrence, standardization of diagnostic criteria and precise treatment protocols is challenging. The majority of localized sarcomas are treated with excision mostly followed by adjuvant radiotherapy to control local recurrence [1, 2]. Few sarcoma types are chemo-sensitive, such as rhabdomyosarcoma, osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma [2, 3]. In the metastatic setting, the 5-year overall survival rates do not exceed 20%, highlighting that effective treatment of advanced disease remains a challenge. There is clear need for new therapeutic options in advanced sarcomas [4].

Some of the molecular alterations that are found in tumors are druggable and this has been a significant turning point in cancer treatment. One of the most important representatives are tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) that are used for the treatment of diverse tumor types, such as imatinib for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) [5]. Unfortunately, today most of the oncogenic driver alterations remain undruggable.

Very recently, it has been proven that tumors with fusions of one of the three neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase genes (NTRK1, NTRK2 and NTRK3) can be treated with tyrosine receptor kinase (TRK) -inhibitors. The first generation TRK-inhibitors, larotrectinib and entrectinib [6], show excellent response rates and durable effects in tumors that harbor fusion of one of the NTRK genes, regardless of tumor type or site of origin. The adverse events are well tolerated. Still, a major obstacle for those inhibitors is the development of resistance. Therefore, new generation TRK-inhibitors are developed, such as LOXO-195 and repotrectinib [7, 8].

Despite the promising results of TRK-inhibition, NTRK fusions are rare genetic events. Among sarcomas, infantile fibrosarcomas show fusions of the NTRK3 gene in more than 90% of the cases [9]. The rates of NTRK fusions in the remaining sarcoma types are unfortunately very low. Moreover, no clear morphologic criteria are established for the recognition of the NTRK-fused sarcomas. A NTRK fusion has to be demonstrated by means of molecular analysis. Immunohistochemistry can be performed as an enrichment strategy to select tumors for subsequent molecular analysis In a previous publication, we suggested an algorithm for determining which sarcomas are more likely to carry this fusion [10].

In this study, we investigated the expression of the pan-TRK antibody in different types of soft tissue and bone tumors by immunohistochemistry and we correlated the expression of the positive cases with the presence of NTRK fusions. Furthermore, we summarized the clinicopathological characteristics, in an attempt to give more information about the identification of these tumors, in conjunction with the cases that are described in the literature.

Materials and Methods

Tissue Samples

Archival formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue samples from 70 patients with soft tissue and bone tumors were retrieved from the Department of Pathology at the Antwerp University Hospital. The tissue samples were collected from biopsy material as well as excision specimens. The material was not older than 5 years, to avoid loss of immunoreactivity and to obtain quality material for the additional molecular analysis. The biopsies were fixed in 4% formaldehyde for up to 12 h while the excision samples were fixed for up to 32 h.

Inclusion criteria where all locally aggressive and malignant soft tissue tumors, except infantile fibrosarcoma, given their know molecular status with NTRK3 fusions [9]. This was the only exclusion criterion, while all age groups and ethnicities were incorporated.

All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

As it was a retrospective study on archival material, no informed consent of the patients could be obtained.

We received approval by the Ethics Committee of the Antwerp University Hospital/University of Antwerp (EC 18/45/517) to use historical samples without additional informed consent from the patients.


As a reference method we used the VENTANA pan-TRK assay (clone EPR17341) performed according to the instructions of the vendor on a Benchmark Ultra (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, United States). This widely used EPR17341 clone is reactive with a conserved proprietary peptide sequence from the C-terminus of TRKA, TRKB and TRKC, and is therefore reactive with any of the oncogenic TRK proteins, although a lesser sensitivity for NTRK3 fusions is described.

We looked at the expression of TRK in the tumor cells. All stained slides were assessed and scored independently by two pathologist (VS. and PP). Tumors were considered positive if ≥1% of tumor cells exhibit staining at any intensity above background [11, 12]. In addition, the different subcellular staining patterns (cytoplasmic, membranous, nuclear and peri-nuclear) were all considered to be positive. Moreover, for the evaluation of the immunohistochemical staining we also used the modified Histoscore (H-score) [13]. This is a semiquantitative assessment of both intensity and staining and the percentage of positive cells.

Evaluation of the slides was based on scanned slides at a Philips platform.

Molecular Techniques

The NTRK fusion status and possible fusion partner of the samples was confirmed by next generation sequencing (NGS). Targeted RNA-based NGS was conducted with the Oncomine Focus Assay (OFA) panel (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Francisco, CA, United States) on an S5 instrument, according to the manufacturer’s recommendations.


Pan-TRK Immunohistochemical Expression in Diverse Tumor Types and Correlation With NTRK Fusions

We investigated the immunohistochemical expression of TRK in diverse types of soft tissue and bone tumors. Tumor characteristics are summarized in Table 1.


TABLE 1. Tumor characteristics.

Among the different tumor types, seven tumors (10%) displayed immunohistochemical positivity for pan-TRK in the tumor cells. The remaining 63 tumors showed no pan-TRK expression. The immunohistochemical expression of these seven cases according to the H-score is illustrated in Table 2.


TABLE 2. Evaluation of immunohistochemical positivity for pan-TRK according to H-score.

Among the positive tumors there were two alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas, one epithelioid angiosarcoma, one malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST), one osteosarcoma and two spindle cell sarcomas, not otherwise specified (NOS). All but one were reported as high grade tumors. The low-grade tumor was a spindle cell sarcoma NOS.

NGS RNA analysis was performed in all positive cases. Two out of these (nearly 28,6% among the pan-TRK positive cases and 2,86% among all tumors included in this study) showed an NTRK fusion, while the rest did not. The characteristics of the tumors with the fusion are summarized in Table 3.


TABLE 3. Summary of clinical, immunohistochemical, and molecular data.

A Low-Grade Spindle Cell Tumor With an ETV6-NTRK3 Fusion

The first case concerned a 10 year-old male with a cutaneous tumor on his finger. The duration of the lesion could not be determined accurately but was estimated by the parents to be six to seven years. No previous operations or other therapies were mentioned.

Macroscopically, there was a polypoid lesion that measured approximately 5 mm (Figure 1A). Microscopy revealed a dermal spindle cell proliferation. The cells were arranged in a fascicular pattern. There was some variation in size and shape but there was no striking pleiomorphism. Mitotic activity was present (up to 5 mitosis/10 high power fields), but no necrosis was perceived. There was local mucin deposition between tumor cells. Finally, some blood vessels within the tumor showed hyalinization and presence of multinucleated cells in the vessel wall (Figure 1B). A wide range of immunohistochemical stainings were performed, such as CD68, SMA, desmin, EMA, mucin 4, SOX10, S100 and CD34, from which we could not deduce a specific differentiation line of the tumor cells. More specifically, CD68 and SMA stained focally, while the rest was negative. Moreover, immunohistochemical examination for Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) proved to be negative.


FIGURE 1. (A) HE, 20×. Polypoid dermal spindle cell proliferation. (B) HE, 100×. The tumors display a fascicular growth pattern. There are myxoid areas (red arrow), as well as vessel walls with presence of multinucleated cells (green arrow). (C) Pan-TRK nuclear positivity in the tumor cells. Pan-TRK assay (clone EPR17341), DAB, magnification ×200.

The tumor was located in the dermis with focal extension in to the subcutis. The lesion was completely removed but with narrow margins.

Nuclear positivity of the tumor cells for pan-TRK was noticed on immunohistochemistry (Figure 1C). The NGS analysis revealed an ETV6-NTRK3 fusion (1,328 reads out of a total of 52,464 mapped fusion panel reads). The patient underwent positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET-CT) but no metastatic lesions could be detected. No signs of local recurrence or disseminations were noticed almost a year after the excision.

A High-Grade Spindle Cell Tumor With a TFG-NTRK3 Fusion

The second case concerned a 19 years-old man. The patient presented with a tumor on the antero-external side of the right tibia dating for several months. The tumor was located intramuscularly with extension to the subcutaneous fat tissue. Three months after the first examination, the tumor was excised. Macroscopically, an almost 14 cm large mass was seen. Microscopy revealed a multinodular lesion that was partially surrounded by a thin capsule. Spindle-shaped tumor cells with a fascicular growth pattern were noticed. Thickened collagen bundles were seen in between tumor cells, as well as areas with calcification and ossification (Figure 2A). There was high mitotic activity and also necrosis. After extensive immunohistochemical analysis, including antibodies against pan-cytokeratin, S100, CD34, beta-catenin, SMA, desmin, CD10 and MDM2, the tumor was classified as high-grade spindle cell sarcoma NOS. Again here, immunohistochemistry for S100 and CD34 was negative. Despite the fact that the tumor was completely excised, given its high-grade, the patient received adjuvant radiotherapy. Four months after the excision the patient developed multiple lung metastases, which were treated with radiotherapy. Immunohistochemistry on the material from the first excision revealed a cytoplasmatic positivity for pan-TRK in the majority of the tumor cells (Figure 2B). NGS analysis showed the presence of a TFG-NTRK3 fusion (424 reads out of a total of 2,668 mapped fusion panel reads). The patient started with larotrectinib at a dose of 100 mg twice daily. The patient was still alive a month after the initiation of treatment and was then lost from follow-up.


FIGURE 2. (A) HE, 20×. Spindle cell proliferation. Between the tumor cells are thick collagen fibers (red arrow), as well as areas with calcification and ossification (green arrows). (B) Pan-TRK cytoplasmic positivity in the tumor cells. Pan-TRK assay (clone EPR17341), DAB, magnification ×100.


TRK is a member of the tyrosine kinase family, predominantly known for its role in neuronal cell differentiation. There are three receptors (TRK A, B, and C) encoded by the three NTRK genes, NTRK 1, 2, and 3, respectively [9]. TRK is a transmembrane receptor, that upon its binding with a ligand, undergoes dimerization. TRK dimerization leads to activation of three signaling pathways: the PI3K/AKT, the MAPK and the PLCγ pathway, all of which impact cell proliferation, cell growth, and cell survival [14] (Figure 3). Fusion of one of the three NTRK genes leads to ligand independent constitutive activation of the TRK signaling pathway that can induce uncontrolled cell growth and proliferation, neo-angiogenesis and cell migration [15].


FIGURE 3. Schematic illustration of the TRK signaling pathway and its role to cell differentiation. Created with BioRender.com.

NTRK fusions are highly actionable driver alterations that are found across many different tumor types. TRK inhibitors are very active against tumors that harbor one of the NTRK fusions. These drugs have a high response rate and durable responses [14, 15]. Hence, detection of NTRK-fused tumors can have important therapeutic consequences for the patient.

With regard to sarcomas, Infantile Fibrosarcoma (IF) shows the ETV6-NTRK3 fusion in more than 90% of the cases [9]. No other specific sarcoma types are corelated with the presence of fusions of one of the NTRK genes. Moreover, sarcomas with an NTRK fusion show no other actionable alterations within the same tumor [16]. Thus, sarcomas with a known driver oncogenic alteration, as for instance alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma or synovial sarcoma, are less likely to harbor fusions of one of the three NTRK genes. This is in line with our results, where the two NTRK-fused tumors where not of a histologic type that carries a specific genetic alteration. Consequently, testing for NTRK fusions should be prioritized in sarcomas with high NTRK fusion frequency, while testing in sarcomas with a canonical oncogenic alteration might not have any diagnostic or therapeutic value [17].

Currently, correct identification of NTRK-fused sarcomas is only possible by means of molecular techniques. However, recently there have been attempts to describe the morphological features of tumors carrying this molecular alteration. To date, various morphological features have been described in NTRK-fused sarcomas, the most consistent being spindle cell morphology [10]. Growth patterns attributed to these tumors are summarized in our previous review[10] and include lipofibromatosis-like [18, 19], hemangiopericytoma-like [20], fibrosarcoma-like [2123], neoplasms resembling inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors [24, 25] and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans-like [26]. Moreover, spindle cell tumors with myxoid features [27] as well as characteristic blood vessels with perivascular thick collagen deposition [28] are also reported.

On a molecular basis, NTRK fusions are the driving oncogenic mechanisms, with fusions of the NTRK3 gene being the most frequent, followed by fusions of the NTRK1 gene, while only a few show NTRK2 fusions [10].

In our case, both tumors with NTRK fusion presented with a spindle cell morphology. None of the tumors showed a characteristic growth pattern like those previously mentioned. It is suggested that the majority of the NTRK-rearranged mesenchymal neoplasms display a combination of morphological patterns, which could be a helpful clue in tumor recognition [29]. Indeed, one of the tumors that we present also showed hyalinization of the blood vessels while the other displayed thickened collagen bundles between the tumor cells.

In many cases in literature, the tumors expressed CD34 and/or S100-protein on immunohistochemistry [1823, 26, 28, 30]. None of the NTRK-fused cases in our series were positive for these immunohistochemical markers. However, this could be a useful diagnostic tool in cases of a spindle cell tumor without a specific growth pattern, in order to pinpoint those neoplasms that need further investigation for the presence of the fusion.

Pan-TRK immunohistochemistry is a reliable screening method for the detection of NTRK fusions with sensitivity and specificity exceeding 95% [12, 31]. Careful interpretation of the immunohistochemical staining is though recommended, since its specificity is low in sarcomas with neural or myogenic differentiation, as wild-type TRK protein is physiologically expressed in neural and smooth muscle tissue [32].

In our samples, two out of the seven immunohistochemical positive cases (nearly 28,6%) correlated with the presence of a NTRK fusion. This is in line with a very recently published study of Nozzoli et.al., where two of the eight immunohistochemical positive cases that had available RNA material for NGS, proven to harbor an NTRK fusion [33]. The ratio of sarcomas with a fusion in relation to the total population of the 70 cases examined in our series is approximately 2,8%. False-negative cases, with negative pan-TRK immunohistochemistry while the tumor was proven to harbor a NTRK fusion, are rarely described [29, 31, 34]. The staining pattern of the antibody also varies in intensity and localization. Different subcellular staining patterns have been documented such as cytoplasmic, cell membranous, nuclear with or without peri-nuclear accentuation, all of which are considered as positive [22, 31, 35, 36]. All these staining patterns suggest the presence of the fusion, and molecular testing is needed for confirmation. Subsequently, there has been an attempt to demonstrate a correlation between the staining pattern and the NTRK gene fusion. Hence, it has been shown that fusions of the NTRK1 gene mostly correlate with a diffuse cytoplasmic staining, while nuclear and rather weak pan-TRK staining is frequently mentioned with NTRK3 gene fusions [29]. Furthermore, nuclear positivity is correlated with ETV6-NTRK3 fusion in different tumor types [31, 37]. This is consistent with our findings, where one of the tumors showed pan-TRK weak nuclear positivity, and this tumor harbored an ETV6-NTRK3 rearrangement.

The prognosis of NTRK1- and NTRK3- fused sarcomas in correlation with histomorphology, has also been a subject of investigation. Sarcomas with NTRK1 gene fusions can present a low- or a high-grade histomorphology. While morphologically high-grade NTRK1-fused tumors display an aggressive course in the majority of the cases, morphologically low-grade NTRK1-fused sarcomas can have a favorable clinical course [10, 38]. On the other hand, sarcomas with fusions of the NTRK3 gene and especially those with ETV6 fusion partner, are mainly aggressive neoplasms, even those with intermediate cytological atypia [10, 39]. Low-grade cytomorphology is usually not a feature of these fusions. This is in contrast with our findings. We describe a tumor with ETV6-NTRK3 fusion with a rather indolent course. The tumor was present for almost six to seven years prior to the diagnosis and showed no signs of recurrence or metastatic spread almost a year after the excision. Morphologically, the tumor showed a cellular spindle cell proliferation without pronounced cytological atypia; mitotic activity was apparent but rather limited, while no necrosis was seen. An interesting feature was the hyalinization and presence of multinucleated cells in the blood vessel wall.

In addition, we describe a TFG-NTRK3 fused sarcoma with an aggressive course. From a histological point of view, the tumor was a high-grade neoplasm with marked cytological atypia, increased mitotic activity as well as areas of necrosis. No CD34 or S100-protein expression was observed. The patient also developed disseminated disease. These findings are again in contrast with the features of the limited TFG-NTRK3 fused mesenchymal tumors documented in the literature [18, 39]. TFG-NTRK3 sarcomas are amongst the rare NTRK3-fused sarcoma cases with a rather favorable histological and clinical picture. Opposite to our case, the tumors are known to display mostly an intermediate cytological grade or a lipofibromatosis-like morphology. Immunohistochemical positivity of the neoplastic cells with CD34 and S100-protein were documented, in contrast to our case. The prognosis of these tumors is reported favorable with no evidence of recurrence or metastasis in the (rather limited) follow up period.

Among these two tumors, the one with the best prognosis was a superficial lesion on the acral skin, while the one with the worst clinical course was located in the deep soft tissues. It therefore seems that in addition to the presence of an NTRK fusion, tumor location might also has a prognostic value.


NTRK fusions are rare genetic events that can appear in a wide range of tumor types, including mesenchymal tumors. Identification of rearrangement of one of the three NTRK genes can lead to right treatment choices, as they show great benefit from TRK-inhibitory therapy. Nowadays, we start to recognize the histomorphology that in most cases correlates with the presence of the NTRK fusion in sarcomas. With our research, we aimed to broaden the diagnostic spectrum of this category and its correlation with the clinical and prognostic aspects. We described two soft tissue tumors with NTRK3 fusions among 70 soft tissue and bone sarcomas. Both are spindle cell neoplasm from the soft tissues with variable growth patterns, in accordance with prior publications. Pan-TRK immunohistochemistry was positive, and one of the cases displayed weak nuclear staining which correlated with the ETV6 fusion partner. In contrast to what has been described in literature, none of the tumors we present showed CD34 or S100-protein expression on immunohistochemistry. Moreover, we investigated the correlation of morphology and clinical behavior of these tumors. Namely, the neoplasm with the ETV6-NTRK3 fusion was superficial located and displayed an indolent course, in contrast to the published cases that display an aggressive behavior. Finally, we described an exceedingly rare TFG-NTRK3 – fused sarcoma with location in deep soft tissue that developed metastatic disease.

To conclude, NTRK-fused sarcomas are spindle cell tumors with variable growth patterns. Pan-TRK immunohistochemistry can pinpoint the cases that need further investigation by means of molecular testing. Nuclear positivity correlates with ETV6-NTRK3 fusion. According to our results, the presence of specific fusion partners do not seem to be a good surrogate marker to predict prognosis. Location of the tumor (superficial versus deep) may be an additional prognostic factor.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Ethics Committee of the Antwerp University Hospital/University of Antwerp. Written informed consent for participation was not provided by the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin because: the study is retrospective and we used only historical samples for which additional informed consent from the patients was not needed.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, VS, PP; Formal analysis, VS; Funding acquisition, PP and ES; Investigation, VS, KW; Methodology, VS; Supervision, ES, PP and EM; Visualization, V.S.; Writing—original draft, VS; Writing—review andamp; editing, VS, KW, KN, GS, VD, PD, ES, EM. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.


1. Gamboa, AC, Gronchi, A, and Cardona, K. Soft‐tissue Sarcoma in Adults: An Update on the Current State of Histiotype‐specific Management in an Era of Personalized Medicine. CA A Cancer J Clin (2020) 70(3):200–29. doi:10.3322/caac.21605

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Dangoor, A, Seddon, B, Gerrand, C, Grimer, R, Whelan, J, and Judson, I. UK Guidelines for the Management of Soft Tissue Sarcomas. Clin Sarcoma Res (2016) 6:20. doi:10.1186/s13569-016-0060-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Gerrand, C, Athanasou, N, Athanasou, N, Brennan, B, Grimer, R, Judson, I, et al. UK Guidelines for the Management of Bone Sarcomas. Clin Sarcoma Res (2016) 6:7. doi:10.1186/s13569-016-0047-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Bessen, T, Caughey, GE, Shakib, S, Potter, JA, Reid, J, Farshid, G, et al. A Population-Based Study of Soft Tissue Sarcoma Incidence and Survival in Australia: An Analysis of 26,970 Cases. Cancer Epidemiol (2019) 63:101590. doi:10.1016/j.canep.2019.101590

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Reichardt, P. The Story of Imatinib in GIST - a Journey through the Development of a Targeted Therapy. Oncol Res Treat (2018) 41(7-8):472–7. doi:10.1159/000487511

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Drilon, A. TRK Inhibitors in TRK Fusion-Positive Cancers. Ann Oncol (2019) 30(Suppl. 8):viii23–viii30. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdz282

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Drilon, A, Nagasubramanian, R, Blake, JF, Ku, N, Tuch, BB, Ebata, K, et al. A Next-Generation TRK Kinase Inhibitor Overcomes Acquired Resistance to Prior TRK Kinase Inhibition in Patients with TRK Fusion-Positive Solid Tumors. Cancer Discov (2017) 7(9):963–72. doi:10.1158/2159-8290.CD-17-0507

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Drilon, A, Ou, S-HI, Cho, BC, Kim, D-W, Lee, J, Lin, JJ, et al. Repotrectinib (TPX-0005) Is a Next-Generation ROS1/TRK/ALK Inhibitor that Potently Inhibits ROS1/TRK/ALK Solvent- Front Mutations. Cancer Discov (2018) 8(10):1227–36. doi:10.1158/2159-8290.CD-18-0484

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Cocco, E, Scaltriti, M, and Drilon, A. NTRK Fusion-Positive Cancers and TRK Inhibitor Therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol (2018) 15(12):731–47. doi:10.1038/s41571-018-0113-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Siozopoulou, V, Smits, E, De Winne, K, Marcq, E, and Pauwels, P. NTRK Fusions in Sarcomas: Diagnostic Challenges and Clinical Aspects. Diagnostics (2021) 11(3):478. doi:10.3390/diagnostics11030478

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Gatalica, Z, Xiu, J, Swensen, J, and Vranic, S. Molecular Characterization of Cancers with NTRK Gene Fusions. Mod Pathol (2019) 32(1):147–53. doi:10.1038/s41379-018-0118-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. De Winne, K, Sorber, L, Lambin, S, Siozopoulou, V, Beniuga, G, Dedeurwaerdere, F, et al. Immunohistochemistry as a Screening Tool for NTRK Gene Fusions: Results of a First Belgian Ring Trial. Virchows Arch (2021) 478(2):283–91. doi:10.1007/s00428-020-02921-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Detre, S, Saclani Jotti, G, and Dowsett, M. A "quickscore" Method for Immunohistochemical Semiquantitation: Validation for Oestrogen Receptor in Breast Carcinomas. J Clin Pathol (1995) 48(9):876–8. doi:10.1136/jcp.48.9.876

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Kummar, S, and Lassen, UN. TRK Inhibition: A New Tumor-Agnostic Treatment Strategy. Targ Oncol (2018) 13(5):545–56. doi:10.1007/s11523-018-0590-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Vaishnavi, A, Le, AT, and Doebele, RC. TRKing Down an Old Oncogene in a new era of Targeted Therapy. Cancer Discov (2015) 5(1):25–34. doi:10.1158/2159-8290.CD-14-0765

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Hong, DS, Bauer, TM, Lee, JJ, Dowlati, A, Brose, MS, Farago, AF, et al. Larotrectinib in Adult Patients with Solid Tumours: a multi-centre, Open-Label, Phase I Dose-Escalation Study. Ann Oncol (2019) 30(2):325–31. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdy539

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Demetri, GD, Antonescu, CR, Bjerkehagen, B, Bovée, JVMG, Boye, K, Chacón, M, et al. Diagnosis and Management of Tropomyosin Receptor Kinase (TRK) Fusion Sarcomas: Expert Recommendations from the World Sarcoma Network. Ann Oncol (2020) 31(11):1506–17. doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.2232

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Kao, YC, Suurmeijer, AJH, Argani, P, Dickson, BC, Zhang, L, Sung, YS, et al. Soft Tissue Tumors Characterized by a Wide Spectrum of Kinase Fusions Share a Lipofibromatosis‐like Neural Tumor Pattern. Genes Chromosomes Cancer (2020) 59(10):575–83. doi:10.1002/gcc.22877

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Agaram, NP, Zhang, L, Sung, Y-S, Chen, C-L, Chung, CT, Antonescu, CR, et al. Recurrent NTRK1 Gene Fusions Define a Novel Subset of Locally Aggressive Lipofibromatosis-like Neural Tumors. Am J Surg Pathol (2016) 40(10):1407–16. doi:10.1097/PAS.0000000000000675

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Haller, F, Knopf, J, Ackermann, A, Bieg, M, Kleinheinz, K, Schlesner, M, et al. Paediatric and Adult Soft Tissue Sarcomas withNTRK1gene Fusions: a Subset of Spindle Cell Sarcomas Unified by a Prominent Myopericytic/haemangiopericytic Pattern. J Pathol (2016) 238(5):700–10. doi:10.1002/path.4701

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Croce, S, Hostein, I, Longacre, TA, Mills, AM, Pérot, G, Devouassoux-Shisheboran, M, et al. Uterine and Vaginal Sarcomas Resembling Fibrosarcoma: a Clinicopathological and Molecular Analysis of 13 Cases Showing Common NTRK-Rearrangements and the Description of a COL1A1-PDGFB Fusion Novel to Uterine Neoplasms. Mod Pathol (2019) 32(7):1008–22. doi:10.1038/s41379-018-0184-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Chiang, S, Cotzia, P, Hyman, DM, Drilon, A, Tap, WD, Zhang, L, et al. NTRK Fusions Define a Novel Uterine Sarcoma Subtype with Features of Fibrosarcoma. Am J Surg Pathol (2018) 42(6):791–8. doi:10.1097/PAS.0000000000001055

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Rabban, JT, Devine, WP, Sangoi, AR, Poder, L, Alvarez, E, Davis, JL, et al. NTRK Fusion Cervical Sarcoma: a Report of Three Cases, Emphasising Morphological and Immunohistochemical Distinction from Other Uterine Sarcomas, Including Adenosarcoma. Histopathology (2020) 77(1):100–11. doi:10.1111/his.14069

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Alassiri, AH, Ali, RH, Shen, Y, Lum, A, Strahlendorf, C, Deyell, R, et al. ETV6-NTRK3 Is Expressed in a Subset of ALK-Negative Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumors. Am J Surg Pathol (2016) 40(8):1051–61. doi:10.1097/PAS.0000000000000677

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Yamamoto, H, Yoshida, A, Taguchi, K, Kohashi, K, Hatanaka, Y, Yamashita, A, et al. ALK,ROS1andNTRK3gene Rearrangements in Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumours. Histopathology (2016) 69(1):72–83. doi:10.1111/his.12910

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Olson, N, Rouhi, O, Zhang, L, Angeles, C, Bridge, J, Lopez-Terrada, D, et al. A Novel Case of an Aggressive Superficial Spindle Cell Sarcoma in an Adult Resembling Fibrosarcomatous Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans and Harboring anEML4-NTRK3fusion. J Cutan Pathol (2018) 45(12):933–9. doi:10.1111/cup.13348

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. So, YK, Chow, C, To, KF, Chan, JKC, and Cheuk, W. Myxoid Spindle Cell Sarcoma with LMNA-NTRK Fusion: Expanding the Morphologic Spectrum of NTRK-Rearranged Tumors. Int J Surg Pathol (2020) 28(5):574–8. doi:10.1177/1066896920905888

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Kao, Y-C, Flucke, U, Eijkelenboom, A, Zhang, L, Sung, Y-S, Suurmeijer, AJH, et al. Novel EWSR1-SMAD3 Gene Fusions in a Group of Acral Fibroblastic Spindle Cell Neoplasms. Am J Surg Pathol (2018) 42(4):522–8. doi:10.1097/PAS.0000000000001002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Brčić, I, Godschachner, TM, Bergovec, M, Igrec, J, Till, H, Lackner, H, et al. Broadening the Spectrum of NTRK Rearranged Mesenchymal Tumors and Usefulness of Pan-TRK Immunohistochemistry for Identification of NTRK Fusions. Mod Pathol (2021) 34(2):396–407. doi:10.1038/s41379-020-00657-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Davis, JL, Lockwood, CM, Stohr, B, Boecking, C, Al-Ibraheemi, A, DuBois, SG, et al. Expanding the Spectrum of Pediatric NTRK-Rearranged Mesenchymal Tumors. Am J Surg Pathol (2019) 43(4):435–45. doi:10.1097/PAS.0000000000001203

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Hechtman, JF, Benayed, R, Hyman, DM, Drilon, A, Zehir, A, Frosina, D, et al. Pan-Trk Immunohistochemistry Is an Efficient and Reliable Screen for the Detection of NTRK Fusions. Am J Surg Pathol (2017) 41(11):1547–51. doi:10.1097/PAS.0000000000000911

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Solomon, JP, Benayed, R, Hechtman, JF, and Ladanyi, M. Identifying Patients with NTRK Fusion Cancer. Ann Oncol (2019) 30(Suppl. l_8):viii16–viii22. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdz384

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Nozzoli, F, Lazar, AJ, Castiglione, F, Campanacci, DA, Beltrami, G, De Logu, F, et al. NTRK Fusions Detection in Paediatric Sarcomas to Expand the Morphological Spectrum and Clinical Relevance of Selected Entities. Pathol Oncol Res. 2022;28. doi:10.3389/pore.2022.1610237

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Rudzinski, ER, Lockwood, CM, Stohr, BA, Vargas, SO, Sheridan, R, Black, JO, et al. Pan-Trk Immunohistochemistry Identifies NTRK Rearrangements in Pediatric Mesenchymal Tumors. Am J Surg Pathol (2018) 42(7):927–35. doi:10.1097/PAS.0000000000001062

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Solomon, JP, Linkov, I, Rosado, A, Mullaney, K, Rosen, EY, Frosina, D, et al. NTRK Fusion Detection across Multiple Assays and 33,997 Cases: Diagnostic Implications and Pitfalls. Mod Pathol (2020) 33(1):38–46. doi:10.1038/s41379-019-0324-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Hung, YP, Fletcher, CDM, and Hornick, JL. Evaluation of Pan-TRK Immunohistochemistry in Infantile Fibrosarcoma, Lipofibromatosis-like Neural Tumour and Histological Mimics. Histopathology (2018) 73(4):634–44. doi:10.1111/his.13666

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Csanyi-Bastien, M, Lanic, M-D, Beaussire, L, Ferric, S, François, A, Meseure, D, et al. Pan-TRK Immunohistochemistry Is Highly Correlated with NTRK3 Gene Rearrangements in Salivary Gland Tumors. Am J Surg Pathol (2021) 45:1487–98. doi:10.1097/PAS.0000000000001718

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Suurmeijer, AJH, Dickson, BC, Swanson, D, Zhang, L, Sung, Y-S, Cotzia, P, et al. A Novel Group of Spindle Cell Tumors Defined by S100 and CD34 Co-expression Shows Recurrent Fusions Involving RAF1, BRAF, and NTRK1/2 Genes. Genes Chromosomes Cancer (2018) 57(12):611–21. doi:10.1002/gcc.22671

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Suurmeijer, AJ, Dickson, BC, Swanson, D, Zhang, L, Sung, YS, Huang, HY, et al. The Histologic Spectrum of Soft Tissue Spindle Cell Tumors with NTRK3 Gene Rearrangements. Genes Chromosomes Cancer (2019) 58(11):739–46. doi:10.1002/gcc.22767

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: sarcoma, prognosis, NTRK fusion, TRK immunohistochemistry, NTRK fusion partner, histology

Citation: Siozopoulou V, Marcq E, De Winne K, Norga K, Schmitz G, Duwel V, Delvenne P, Smits E and Pauwels P (2022) NTRK Fusions in a Sarcomas Series: Pathology, Molecular and Clinical Aspects. Pathol. Oncol. Res. 28:1610423. doi: 10.3389/pore.2022.1610423

Received: 07 March 2022; Accepted: 30 March 2022;
Published: 11 May 2022.

Edited by:

Andrea Ladányi, National Institute of Oncology (NIO), Hungary

Copyright © 2022 Siozopoulou, Marcq, De Winne, Norga, Schmitz, Duwel, Delvenne, Smits and Pauwels. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Vasiliki Siozopoulou, vasiliki.siozopoulou@uza.be, vasiliki.siozopoulou@uantwerpen.be, orcid.org/0000-0001-8608-4660