Clinicopathological Significance of Estrogen Receptor β and Estrogen Synthesizing/Metabolizing Enzymes in Urothelial Carcinoma of Urinary Bladder
Naomi Sato1, 
Kazue Ise2,3, Shuko Hata2,3, Shinichi Yamashita4, Akihiro Ito4, 
Hironobu Sasano3 and 
Yasuhiro Nakamura2,3*- 1Division of Pathology, Sendai City Hospital, Sendai, Japan
- 2Division of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai, Japan
- 3Department of Pathology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
- 4Department of Urology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
Sex-specific differences in the incidence of urinary bladder carcinomas are well known, and the possible involvement of sex steroids has been proposed. We previously reported the association of the loss of androgen receptors and androgen-producing enzymes with tumor progression of urinary bladder cancer patients. Clinically, the selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) were reported to suppress the progression of these tumors but the status of estrogen receptors (ERs) has not been well studied in patients with bladder urinary cancer. Moreover, not only ERs but also estrogen-related enzymes, such as aromatase, steroid sulfatase (STS), and estrogen sulfotransferase (EST), have been reported in the biological/clinical behavior of various hormone-dependent carcinomas but not studied in urinary bladder carcinoma. Therefore, in this study, we immunolocalized ERs as well as estrogen metabolizing enzymes in urinary bladder carcinoma and performed immunoblotting and cell proliferation assays using the bladder urothelial carcinoma cell line, T24. The results revealed that the loss of STS and aromatase was significantly correlated with advanced stages of the carcinoma. In vitro studies also revealed that T24 cell proliferation rates were significantly ameliorated after treatment with estradiol or diarylpropionitrile (DPN). EST and aromatase were also significantly correlated with the nuclear grade of the carcinoma. The results of our present study, for the first time, demonstrated that biologically active estrogens that bind to ERs could suppress tumor progression and the inactive ones could promote its progression and the potential clinical utility of SERM treatment in selective patients with urinary bladder carcinoma.
Introduction
Urinary bladder urothelial carcinoma is the seventh most common cancer worldwide, and its occurrence has recently increased. This carcinoma is also known to be three times more common in males than in females [1], but the reasons for this difference are unknown [2]. One proposed hypothesis is that androgens could play an essential role in regulating the onset of urinary bladder urothelial carcinoma [3, 4]. The results of previously reported epidemiologic studies indicated that postmenopausal women harbored an increased risk of developing bladder urothelial carcinoma in comparison to premenopausal women [5], suggesting the potential roles of androgens, as androgens become the more dominant steroids following menopause.
In addition to androgens, estrogens are also well known to be involved in the development of several hormone-dependent carcinomas such as breast, endometrioid, and ovarian carcinomas [6]. Recently, not only estrogens themselves but also estrogen related enzymes have been proposed as a target of hormonal therapy, such as aromatase and aromatase inhibitor, which are used as a gold standard treatment for estrogen-dependent post-menopausal breast cancer patients [7]. Estrogens are also produced from circulating inactive steroids through steroid sulfatase (STS) and/or aromatase, while estrone or E1 is inactivated into estrone sulfate by estrogen sulfotransferase (EST) [6]. Figure 1 summarizes the correlation between steroid hormones and steroid metabolism enzymes. STS has been reported to be expressed in several tissues including the placenta and skin fibroblasts, breasts, and fallopian tubes [8] and has been detected in approximately 90% of breast carcinomas [9], 86% of endometrial carcinomas [10], several histological types of ovarian carcinomas [11], 85% of prostate carcinomas [12], and 61% of colon adenocarcinomas [13]. In addition, STS status has been reported to be correlated with poor survival rate in breast [14], endometrial [10], and ovarian cancer patients [15].
FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1. The correlation between steroid hormones and steroid metabolism enzymes. Aromatase converts androstenedione to estrone and testosterone to estradiol. STS inactivates estrone sulfate and estradiol sulfate, while estrone and estradiol are inactivated by EST. STS: steroid sulfatase, EST: estrogen sulfotransferase, ER: estrogen receptor.
EST expression has also been reported in a wide range of adult and fetal tissues, including healthy urothelial cells and EST, which are considered to protect these tissues from excessive estrogenic effects [16]. ETS expression has been reported to be lower than STS expression in several malignant tissues, such as 40% of invasive breast carcinomas [17], 29% of endometrial carcinomas [10], 77% of prostate carcinomas [12], and 44% of colon carcinomas [13]. In contrast to STS, EST immunoreactivity has been reported to be inversely correlated with tumor size, lymph node status, risk of recurrence, and prognosis in the invasive breast carcinoma [17].
Estrogen receptors (ERs) are expressed in bladder urinary carcinoma cells [18]. In particular, the status of ERβ has been reported to be more abundant than that of ERα in urinary bladder carcinomas [19, 20]. The possible involvement of ERβ in bladder urothelial carcinoma development has been proposed, but its details are not known.
Therefore, in this study, for the first time, we examined the status of STS, EST, and aromatase in the bladder urothelial carcinoma tissue to understand the actions of estrogens further. We also conducted in vitro studies to substantiate the results obtained from immunohistochemical studies in clinical specimens of urinary bladder carcinoma.
Materials and Methods
Patients and Tissue Preparation
A total of 113 cases of primary urinary bladder urothelial carcinoma were retrieved from the surgical pathology files at Tohoku University Hospital (Sendai, Japan). These patients did not receive chemotherapy or hormonal therapy prior to surgery.
All enrolled patients signed the informed consents. The research protocols for this particular study were approved by the Ethics Committee at Tohoku University School of Medicine (2013-1-37).
Immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemistry was performed using the Histofine kit (Nichirei Biosciences, Tokyo, Japan). The antibodies used for immunohistochemistry of Ki-67, ERβ, STS, EST, and aromatase and the details of immunostaining are summarized in Table 1. The antigen-antibody complex was visualized using the 3.3’-diaminobenzidine solution and counterstained using hematoxylin. Ki-67 immunoreactivity was assessed by using the labeling index (LI in %) [21]. ERβ immunoreactivity was scored semiquantitatively, incorporating both the intensity and percentage of positive staining (H-score) [22]. STS, EST, and aromatase were examined in the cytoplasm of bladder urothelial carcinoma cells, and the cases harboring more than 10% positive carcinoma cells were tentatively considered positive in this study [12]. The stained slides were scored by two of the authors, and in case of any discordance, the case was observed under a multi-headed light microscope, and consensus was subsequently obtained.
TABLE 1
TABLE 1. Antibodies used for immunostaining and immunoblotting.
Cell Lines
The human bladder urothelial carcinoma cell line used in this study was the T24 cell line (American Type Cell Culture Collection (ATCC), Manassas, VA, United States). Cells were grown in McCoy’s 5 A medium (Gibco) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Nichirei, Tokyo, Japan) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin.
Immunoblotting ERβ Protein Expression Level in T24 Cells
The protein contents of T24 cells were extracted using M-PER (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL, United States) with Halt protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL, United States) and protein concentration was determined using a Protein Assay Kit (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Osaka, Japan). Proteins were resolved using SDS-PAGE (10% acrylamide gel) and transferred onto a PVDF membrane. After blocking with TBS-T (containing 0.05% Tween 20) and 5% non-fat dry skimmed milk for 1 h at room temperature (20°C), the membranes were incubated overnight at 4°C with the primary antibodies. The membranes were then washed and incubated for 1 h with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse/rabbit IgGs (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom) at room temperature (20°C). Immunoreactivity was subsequently visualized through chemiluminescence (ECL Prime western blotting detection reagents: GE Healthcare).
Cell Proliferation Assay
In the cell proliferation assay, T24 cells were treated with E2 or ERβ agonist DPN in a 96-well plate. For the steroid treatments, we incubated the cells in phenol red-free McCoy’s 5 A medium (HyClone) supplemented with dextran-coated charcoal-stripped FBS (fetal bovine serum) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin for 48 h. Cell proliferation was evaluated using the WST-8 colorimetric assay (Cell Counting Kit-8; Dojindo, Kumamoto, Japan). The status of cell viability was also evaluated as a ratio (%) compared with that of controls.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using R version 3.2.2 (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing Platform: x86_64-w64-mingw32/x64 (64-bit)). The correlation between various factors was evaluated using the Fisher’s precise test. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Student’s t-test was used for the analysis of Ki-67 labeling index.
Results
Immunolocalization of Ki-67, ERβ, STS, EST, and Aromatase
Immunoreactivity of Ki-67 and ERβ was predominantly detected in the nuclei of carcinoma cells (Figure 2), the average labeling index across the whole cohort and the tumor stage were summarized in Figure 3. The Ki-67 labeling index was significantly higher in pT2 than that in pT1 tumor grades (*p = 0.0002 and **p = 0.0006, respectively) (Figure 3A), but the status of ERβ immunoreactivity was not significantly correlated with the tumor grades (Figure 3B).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2. Representative hematoxylin-eosin and immunohistochemistry illustrations of pTa and pT2 histological sections in bladder urothelial carcinoma. Hematoxylin-eosin stained tissue sections (a), Immunohistochemistry for Ki-67 (b), ERβ (c), EST (d), STS (e), and aromatase (f) in bladder urothelial carcinoma. 1a-1f, pTa; 2a-2f, pT2.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3. The results of immunoreactivity for ERβ and Ki-67 in bladder urothelial carcinoma along with their labeling index based on tumor stage. (A), Ki-67 immunoreactivity; (B), ERβ immunoreactivity. *p = 0.0002 and **p = 0.0006.
STS, EST, and aromatase were predominantly detected in the cytoplasm of carcinoma cells (Figure 2). STS and aromatase significantly decreased with the increasing tumor stages (Table 2, p = 0.0017 and p = 0.0430, respectively). EST and aromatase were significantly correlated with tumor nuclear grade (Table 3).
TABLE 2
TABLE 2. Correlation between pT stage and immunoreactivities of STS, EST and aromatase.
TABLE 3
TABLE 3. Correlation between nuclear grade and immunoreactivities of STS, EST and aromatase.
The status of Ki-67, ERβ, STS, EST, and aromatase was not significantly correlated with other clinicopathological parameters including age and sex of the cases examined.
Effects of E2 or DPN Treatment on ERβ Protein Expression in T24 Cells
The expression levels of the ERβ protein were not significantly influenced by E2 or DPN treatment (Figure 4A).
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4. The effects of E2 or DPN treatment on bladder urothelial carcinoma cells. (A), The effects of E2 or DPN on protein expression levels; (B), Proliferation assay of T24 cells in the background of E2 treatment.; (C), Proliferation assay of T24 cells in the background of DPN treatment. *p < 0.0001, **p = 0.0032.
Effects of E2 or DPN Treatment on Cell Proliferation in T24 Cells
We examined the effects of cell proliferation in T24 cells treated with 10–100 nM E2 or DPN. After treatment with E2 or DPN at 10–100 nM for 48 h, the proliferation rates of the T24 cells were significantly reduced (Figures 4B,C).
Discussion
The possible correlation between urothelial bladder carcinomas and sex steroids has been long proposed, but the details are not known. The status of ER expression has been reported to be correlated with the progression or prognosis of urinary bladder carcinomas [19, 23–25], but others have not been able to replicate the findings and an inverse correlation has even been reported [26–29]. However, selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) such as tamoxifen and raloxifen have been consistently reported to inhibit the proliferation and invasion of urinary bladder urothelial carcinoma [19, 20, 30–32]. SERMs are known to harbor high binding affinity for ERs, to function as ER agonists in some specific tissues such as bone, liver, and cardiovascular system, and also act as ER antagonists in the breasts and uterus [7].
Therefore, in this study, we first correlated the loss of STS and aromatase immunoreactivity in urinary bladder urothelial carcinomas with the increased tumor progression. In addition, the cell proliferation rates of T24 cells were significantly reduced following treatment with estradiol (E2) or diarylpropionitrile (DPN). In general, STS and aromatase have both been reported to be related to poor survival in many different carcinomas [10, 14, 15]. However, the results of our present study did demonstrate that STS and aromatase were both inversely related to the progression of urinary bladder urothelial carcinoma. These results, therefore, suggest that more active estrogen could be produced in situ in urothelial carcinoma, and could subsequently regulate the progression of the carcinoma. In addition, EST and aromatase were also significantly correlated with the nuclear grade of carcinoma, indicating that high-grade carcinoma could be associated with the local production/metabolism of estrogens. Previous study reported that ERβ expression and the non-cadherin switch were both accompanied by better recurrence-free survival of patients with urinary bladder urothelial carcinoma [28]. The mechanistic correlation between urinary bladder urothelial carcinoma and ERs is controversial; however the results of our present study are consistent with these findings.
A sex-specific difference (three times more common in men than in women) in the incidence of urinary bladder urothelial carcinoma is also known [1]. In addition, urinary bladder urothelial carcinoma accounts for 3% of all cancer deaths in men and 1.5% in women [2]. Between 1973 and 1999, there was a 33% decline in bladder cancer mortality; however, its reduction has only been detected in male patients [2]. This is because female patients tended to have more advanced disease at the time of diagnosis than men, resulting in higher mortality in women. For instance, 28% of male patients were diagnosed with stage III or IV disease, whereas 43% of the females were diagnosed with those stages [33]. The delay in diagnosis, cultural, biological, and anatomical reasons have been proposed as the reasons of sex discrepancy [2], but the results of our present study suggested that the different status of intratumoral estrogen metabolism could also account for this sex difference. The status of estrogen receptors was by no means correlated with any clinicopathological factors; however, STS and aromatase were inversely correlated with the progression of the disease. These results suggested that decreased levels of biologically active estrogens could result in increased tumor cell proliferation, progression, and adverse clinical outcome of urinary bladder urothelial carcinoma patients. Biologically active estrogens, which can bind the ERs, could ameliorate bladder urothelial carcinoma progression, and this is considered at least one of the reasons why SERMs could suppress the proliferation and invasion of urinary bladder urothelial carcinoma via ER-dependent induction [19, 20, 30–32]. The results of our present study could also account for the reasons why the expression of ERs alone was by no means correlated with the clinical behavior of urinary bladder urothelial carcinoma. However, to the best of our knowledge, the correlation among steroid receptors, sex, and age has not been reported yet. One of the possible reasons for this is that there are very few pre-menopausal female patients of urinary bladder urothelial carcinoma. Therefore, further investigations are required to clarify the sex differences of urinary bladder urothelial carcinoma.
Conclusion
The results of our present study indicated that active estrogens could possibly ameliorate the progression of bladder urothelial carcinoma and that SERMs could be useful for the treatment of bladder urothelial carcinoma. Further investigations are required to elucidate the function of sex steroids in bladder urothelial carcinomas.
Data Availability Statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics Statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Tohoku University School of Medicine (2013-1–37). The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author Contributions
YN and NS planned the experiments; SY and AI provided the materials; KI, NS and YN performed the experiments; NS performed the analytic calculations and wrote the article. YN and HS conceived the original idea and supervised the project. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 26460412.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
We thank the members of the Department of Pathology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine for their support.
References
1. Burger, M, Catto, JWF, Dalbagni, G, Grossman, HB, Herr, H, Karakiewicz, P, et al. Epidemiology and risk factors of urothelial bladder cancer. Eur Urol (2013). 63(2):234–41. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.07.033
2. Madeb, R, and Messing, EM Gender, racial and age differences in bladder cancer incidence and mortality. Urol Oncol (2004). 22(2):86–92. doi:10.1016/s1078-1439(03)00139-x
3. Tuygun, C, Kankaya, D, Imamoglu, A, Sertcelik, A, Zengin, K, Oktay, M, et al. Sex-specific hormone receptors in urothelial carcinomas of the human urinary bladder: a comparative analysis of clinicopathological features and survival outcomes according to receptor expression. Urol Oncol (2011). 29(1):43–51. doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.01.033
4. Boorjian, S, Ugras, S, Mongan, NP, Gudas, LJ, You, X, Tickoo, SK, et al. Androgen receptor expression is inversely correlated with pathologic tumor stage in bladder cancer. Urology (2004). 64(2):383–8. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2004.03.025
5. McGrath, M, Michaud, DS, and De Vivo, I Hormonal and reproductive factors and the risk of bladder cancer in women. Am J Epidemiol (2005). 163(3):236–44. doi:10.1093/aje/kwj028
6. Suzuki, T, Miki, Y, Nakamura, Y, Ito, K, and Sasano, H Steroid sulfatase and estrogen sulfotransferase in human carcinomas. Mol Cell Endocrinol (2011). 340(2):148–53. doi:10.1016/j.mce.2010.11.001
7. Begam, AJ, Jubie, S, and Nanjan, MJ Estrogen receptor agonists/antagonists in breast cancer therapy: a critical review. Bioorg Chem (2017). 71:257–74. doi:10.1016/j.bioorg.2017.02.011
8. Ghosh, D Human sulfatases: a structural perspective to catalysis. Cell Mol Life Sci (2007). 64(15):2013–22. doi:10.1007/s00018-007-7175-y
9. Evans, T, Rowlands, M, Law, M, and Coombes, R Intratumoral oestrone sulphatase activity as a prognostic marker in human breast carcinoma. Br J Cancer (1994). 69:555–61. doi:10.1038/bjc.1994.101
10. Utsunomiya, H, Ito, K, Suzuki, T, Kitamura, T, Kaneko, C, Nakata, T, et al. Steroid sulfatase and estrogen sulfotransferase in human endometrial carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res (2004). 10(17):5850–6. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-04-0040
11. Okuda, T, Saito, H, Sekizawa, A, Shimizu, Y, Akamatsu, T, Kushima, M, et al. Steroid sulfatase expression in ovarian clear cell adenocarcinoma: immunohistochemical study. Gynecol Oncol (2001). 82(3):427–34. doi:10.1006/gyno.2001.6322
12. Nakamura, Y, Suzuki, T, Fukuda, T, Ito, A, Endo, M, Moriya, T, et al. Steroid sulfatase and estrogen sulfotransferase in human prostate cancer. Prostate (2006). 66(9):1005–12. doi:10.1002/pros.20426
13. Sato, R, Suzuki, T, Katayose, Y, Miura, K, Shiiba, K, Tateno, H, et al. Steroid sulfatase and estrogen sulfotransferase in colon carcinoma: regulators of intratumoral estrogen concentrations and potent prognostic factors. Cancer Res (2009). 69(3):914–22. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-0906
14. Utsumi, T, Yoshimura, N, Maruta, M, Takeuchi, S, Ando, J, Maeda, K, et al. Significance of steroid sulfatase expression in human breast cancer. Breast Cancer (1999). 6:298–300. doi:10.1007/bf02966443
15. Chura, JC, Blomquist, CH, Ryu, HS, and Argenta, PA Estrone sulfatase activity in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol (2009). 112(1):205–9. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.08.037
16. Miki, Y, Nakata, T, Suzuki, T, Darnel, AD, Moriya, T, Kaneko, C, et al. Systemic distribution of steroid sulfatase and estrogen sulfotransferase in human adult and fetal tissues. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2002). 87(12):5760–8. doi:10.1210/jc.2002-020670
17. Suzuki, T, Miki, Y, Nakata, T, Shiotsu, Y, Akinaga, S, Inoue, K, et al. Steroid sulfatase and estrogen sulfotransferase in normal human tissue and breast carcinoma. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol (2003). 86(3–5):449–54. doi:10.1016/s0960-0760(03)00356-x
18. Noronha, RFX, and Rao, BR Sex hormone receptors in localized and advanced transitional cell carcinoma of urinary tract in humans. Urology (1986). 28(5):401–3. doi:10.1016/0090-4295(86)90073-7
19. Shen, SS, Smith, CL, Hsieh, J-T, Yu, J, Kim, IY, Jian, W, et al. Expression of estrogen receptors-α and -β in bladder cancer cell lines and human bladder tumor tissue. Cancer (2006). 106(12):2610–6. doi:10.1002/cncr.21945
20. Sonpavde, G, Okuno, N, Weiss, H, Yu, J, Shen, SS, Younes, M, et al. Efficacy of selective estrogen receptor modulators in nude mice bearing human transitional cell carcinoma. Urology (2007). 69(6):1221–6. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2007.02.041
21. Miki, Y, Suzuki, T, Tazawa, C, Yamaguchi, Y, Kitada, K, Honma, S, et al. Aromatase localization in human breast cancer tissues: possible interactions between intratumoral stromal and parenchymal cells. Cancer Res (2007). 67(8):3945–54. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-3105
22. Aasmundstad, TA, Haugen, OA, Johannesen, E, Hoe, AL, and Kvinnsland, S Oestrogen receptor analysis: correlation between enzyme immunoassay and immunohistochemical methods. J Clin Pathol (1992). 45:125–9. doi:10.1136/jcp.45.2.125
23. Kaufmann, O, Baume, H, and Dietel, M Detection of oestrogen receptors in non-invasive and invasive transitional cell carcinomas of the urinary bladder using both conventional immunohistochemistry and the tyramide staining amplification (TSA) technique. J Pathol (1998). 186(2):165–8. doi:10.1002/(sici)1096-9896(1998100)186:2<165::aid-path155>3.0.co;2-y
24. Miyamoto, H, Yao, JL, Chaux, A, Zheng, Y, Hsu, I, Izumi, K, et al. Expression of androgen and oestrogen receptors and its prognostic significance in urothelial neoplasm of the urinary bladder. BJU Int (2012). 109(11):1716–26. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410x.2011.10706.x
25. Nam, JK, Park, SW, Lee, SD, and Chung, MK Prognostic value of sex-hormone receptor expression in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Yonsei Med J (2014). 55(5):1214. doi:10.3349/ymj.2014.55.5.1214
26. Larocca, LM, Giustacchini, M, Maggiano, N, Ranelletti, FO, Piantelli, M, Alcini, E, et al. Growth-inhibitory effect of quercetin and presence of type II estrogen binding sites in primary human transitional cell carcinomas. J Urol (1994). 152(3):1029–33. doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)32649-6
27. Kontos, S, Kominea, A, Melachrinou, M, Balampani, E, and Sotiropoulou-Bonikou, G Inverse expression of estrogen receptor-β and nuclear factor-κB in urinary bladder carcinogenesis. Int J Urol (2010). 17(9):801–9. doi:10.1111/j.1442-2042.2010.02603.x
28. Han, B, Cui, D, Jing, Y, Hong, Y, and Xia, S Estrogen receptor β (ERβ) is a novel prognostic marker of recurrence survival in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer potentially by inhibiting cadherin switch. World J Urol (2012). 30(11):861–7. doi:10.1007/s00345-011-0819-4
29. Mashhadi, R, Pourmand, G, Kosari, F, Mehrsai, A, Salem, S, Pourmand, MR, et al. Role of steroid hormone receptors in formation and progression of bladder carcinoma: a case-control study. Urol J (2014). 11(06):1968–73. doi:10.22037/uj.v11i06.2617
30. Hsieh, T-S Tsong-chang tsai, ann-lii cheng, chang-yao hsieh, ih-jen su, and ming-kuen Lai.Tamoxifen enhances the chemosensitivity of bladder carcinoma cells. J Urol (1995). 154(2):601–5. doi:10.1097/00005392-199508000-00078
31. Kim, HT, Kim, BC, Kim, IY, Mamura, M, Seong, DH, Jang, J-J, et al. Raloxifene, a mixed estrogen agonist/antagonist, induces apoptosis through cleavage of BAD in TSU-PR1 human cancer cells. J Biol Chem (2002). 277(36):32510–5. doi:10.1074/jbc.m202852200
32. Hoffman, KL, Lerner, SP, and Smith, CL Raloxifene inhibits growth of RT4 urothelial carcinoma cells via estrogen receptor-dependent induction of apoptosis and inhibition of proliferation. Horm Cancer (2012). 4(1):24–35. doi:10.1007/s12672-012-0123-9
Keywords: ERβ, urothelial bladder carcinoma, steroid metabolism, steroid sulfatase, aromatase, estrogen sulfotransferase 5
Citation: Sato N, Ise K, Hata S, Yamashita S, Ito A, Sasano H and Nakamura Y (2021) Clinicopathological Significance of Estrogen Receptor β and Estrogen Synthesizing/Metabolizing Enzymes in Urothelial Carcinoma of Urinary Bladder. Pathol. Oncol. Res. 27:589649. doi: 10.3389/pore.2021.589649
Received: 31 July 2020; Accepted: 10 February 2021;
Published: 15 April 2021.
Edited by:
László Kopper, Semmelweis University, HungaryCopyright © 2021 Sato, Ise, Hata, Yamashita, Ito, Sasano and Nakamura. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yasuhiro Nakamura, yasu-naka@tohoku-mpu.ac.jp
