Pathol. Oncol. Res.
Pathology & Oncology Research
Pathol. Oncol. Res.
1532-2807
Frontiers Media S.A.
1611617
10.3389/pore.2023.1611617
Pathology and Oncology Archive
Retraction
Retraction: Associations of porphyromonas gingivalis infection and low beclin1 expression with clinicopathological parameters and survival of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients
Pathology and Oncology Research Editorial Office
10.3389/pore.2023.1611617
Pathology and Oncology Research Editorial Office
*
Frontiers Media SA, Lausanne, Switzerland
Approved by: Pathology and Oncology Research Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland
*Correspondence: Pathology and Oncology Research Editorial Office, editorialoffice@por-journal.com
14
12
2023
2023
29
1611617
30
11
2023
05
12
2023
Copyright © 2023 Pathology and Oncology Research Editorial Office.
2023
Pathology and Oncology Research Editorial Office
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
A Retraction of the Original Research Article Associations of porphyromonas gingivalis infection and low beclin1 expression with clinicopathological parameters and survival of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients by Guo Y, Liu Y, Yang H, Dai N, Zhou F, Yang H, Sun W, Kong J, Yuan X and Gao S (2021). Pathol. Oncol. Res. 27:1609976. doi: 10.3389/pore.2021.1609976
The journal retracts the 08 December 2021 article cited above.
Following publication, concerns were raised regarding data misrepresentation. In particular, multiple discrepancies were identified in the flow cytometry graphs, western blots and bar graphs in Figure 4. Following provision of raw data by the authors, the Editor in Chief concluded that the article’s conclusions and assertions were not sufficiently supported by the findings from the material provided; therefore, the article has been retracted. The authors do not agree to this retraction.