<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Pathol. Oncol. Res.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Pathology &#x26; Oncology Research</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Pathol. Oncol. Res.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1532-2807</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">1611216</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/pore.2023.1611216</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Pathology and Oncology Archive</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Tumor budding as a predictor of disease-free survival in patients with cholangiocarcinoma</article-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="left-running-head">Kim et al.</alt-title>
<alt-title alt-title-type="right-running-head">
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/pore.2023.1611216">10.3389/pore.2023.1611216</ext-link>
</alt-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname>
<given-names>Kyung Bin</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Ahn</surname>
<given-names>Ji Hyun</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001">&#x2a;</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2061277/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kwon</surname>
<given-names>Soon Wook</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname>
<given-names>Su Ji</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname>
<given-names>Yury</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Park</surname>
<given-names>Seo Young</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2264357/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname>
<given-names>Ahrong</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Choi</surname>
<given-names>Kyung Un</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname>
<given-names>Chang Hun</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Huh</surname>
<given-names>Gi Yeong</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Department of Pathology</institution>, <institution>Pusan National University Hospital</institution>, <addr-line>Busan</addr-line>, <country>Republic of Korea</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Department of Pathology</institution>, <institution>Pusan National University School of Medicine</institution>, <addr-line>Yangsan-si</addr-line>, <addr-line>Gyeongsangnamdo</addr-line>, <country>Republic of Korea</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>
<bold>Edited by:</bold> <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1002503/overview">Gabor Cserni</ext-link>, University of Szeged, Hungary</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x2a;Correspondence: Ji Hyun Ahn, <email>jvcjh@hanmail.net</email>
</corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>18</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>29</volume>
<elocation-id>1611216</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>30</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>08</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2023 Kim, Ahn, Kwon, Lee, Lee, Park, Kim, Choi, Lee and Huh.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Kim, Ahn, Kwon, Lee, Lee, Park, Kim, Choi, Lee and Huh</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>
<bold>Background:</bold> Tumor budding is considered a prognostic factor in several solid cancer types. However, we lack comprehensive information on the importance of tumor budding in cholangiocarcinoma. Therefore, we aimed to assess the prognostic value of tumor budding in intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas and to evaluate its correlations with other clinicopathological parameters.</p>
<p>
<bold>Methods:</bold> We monitored 219 patients who underwent surgery for intrahepatic or extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma at the Pusan National University Hospital between 2012 and 2021. Tumor budding was evaluated using the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference scoring system. Tumor budding was classified into low (0&#x2013;4), intermediate (5&#x2013;9), and high (&#x2265;10). For statistical analysis, tumor budding was divided into two groups based on the cut-off value of 10 (lower: 0&#x2013;9 vs. higher: &#x2265;10). The correlations between clinicopathological parameters were examined using the chi-square and Fisher&#x2019;s exact test. The prognostic values of the variables were analyzed using the log-rank test and Cox regression analysis.</p>
<p>
<bold>Results:</bold> Low, intermediate, and high tumor buddings were identified in 135 (61.6%), 63 (28.8), and 21 (9.6%), patients, respectively. Higher tumor budding was related to the presence of lymphatic invasion (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.017), higher tumor grade (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.001), higher N category (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.034). In the univariable and multivariable analyses, higher tumor budding was associated with shorter disease-free survival in 97 (44.3%) patients who underwent R0 resection (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001 and <italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.011). Tumor budding did not significantly correlate with disease-specific survival in entire patients.</p>
<p>
<bold>Conclusion:</bold> Tumor budding may serve as a prognostic factor for intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas treated with R0 resection.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>prognosis</kwd>
<kwd>cholangiocarcinoma</kwd>
<kwd>tumor budding</kwd>
<kwd>prediction</kwd>
<kwd>disease-free survival</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-num rid="cn001">202300130001</contract-num>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">Pusan National University Hospital<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100008130</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="s1">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Cholangiocarcinoma (CC) is a malignant neoplasm originating from epithelial cells lining the biliary tract. CC is divided into intrahepatic CC (iCC) and extrahepatic CC (eCC) depending on its anatomical location. Over the past few decades, the overall incidence of CC, particularly iCC, has gradually increased worldwide [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>]. CC is associated with a poor prognosis, with a 5-year survival rate of 10%&#x2013;49% for iCC and 20%&#x2013;40% for eCC [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>]. However, the prognostic factors for CC remained poorly understood.</p>
<p>Tumor budding (TB) is defined as a single tumor cell or a cluster of fewer than 5&#xa0;cells that are observed separately from the tumor mass exhibiting invasion [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>]. TB is a histopathological phenomenon of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), the process by which epithelial cells are transformed into mesenchymal stem cells. During this process, the cells tend to migrate and invade instead of losing cell polarity and intercellular adhesion. EMT is a crucial developmental process; however, in the case of solid tumors, it promotes tumor growth by increasing invasive and metastatic activity. Since Imai et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>] mentioned it first, TB has been actively investigated mainly in patient with colorectal cancer. TB is associated with lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, local recurrence, and poor prognosis regardless of the TNM stage in patients with colorectal cancer [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>]. In 2016, a consensus was reached to objectively and accurately measure TB in patients with colorectal cancer [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>]. By introducing this concept, studies on the prognostic significance of TB in various cancer types, such as pancreatic, gallbladder, esophageal, and gastric cancers, have been conducted [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">7</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">10</xref>]. Although relevant studies have recently been performed to evaluate the importance of TB in CC, the number remains limited, and only 10 papers have been published to date (as of March 2023) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>].</p>
<p>Hence, we aimed to investigate the relationship between TB and clinicopathological parameters and the prognostic significance of TB in iCC and eCCs.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="s2">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2-1">
<title>Case selection</title>
<p>Based on the medical records, we selected patients who underwent surgery and histopathological examination for biliary tract cancer at Pusan National University Hospital from January 2012 to December 2021 through the medical records. Patients diagnosed with cholangiocarcinoma arising in the intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal extrahepatic bile ducts were included in this study. Patients diagnosed with gallbladder or cystic duct cancer were excluded. Patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy; were diagnosed with cancers, such as undifferentiated, squamous cell, or neuroendocrine carcinomas other than adenocarcinomas, and with missing data were excluded.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-2">
<title>Clinicopathological parameters</title>
<p>Data on age, sex, date of local recurrence, distant metastasis, date of last hospital visit or death, and cause of death were obtained. One pathologist (J.H.Ahn) reviewed all available hematoxylin and eosin (H&#x26;E) slides with pathologic reports to determine the tumor location, size, histologic grade, lymphatic invasion status, venous invasion status, perineural invasion status, and resection marginal status. Depending on the tumor location, each patient was classified into the iCC group or eCC group. The eCC group included the CC arising from the perihilar and distal extrahepatic bile ducts. Pathologic TNM categories and overall stages were reassessed according to the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">20</xref>].</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-3">
<title>Evaluation of tumor budding</title>
<p>TB was basically evaluated according to the criteria recommended by the 2016 International Tumor Budding Consensus (ITBCC) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">6</xref>]. The H&#x26;E-stained slide with the highest degree of budding at the invasive front was selected. Hotspots were identified at low magnification, and the number of TB was counted at &#xd7;200 magnification. Patients with TB were classified into the low (0&#x2013;4), intermediate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">5</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">9</xref>], and high (&#x2265;10) groups. For statistical analysis, TB was reclassified into lower (0&#x2013;9) and higher (&#x2265;10) groups. Two pathologists (K. B. Kim and J. H. Ahn) independently evaluated all available slides containing the tumor samples of each patient. However, they were blinded to all clinical data and the assessment results of the other pathologist. The concordance rate was 89.4%. In cases of disagreement, the two pathologists discussed and reached a consensus.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-4">
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>The correlations between TB and other parameters were evaluated using the chi-square and Fisher&#x2019;s exact test. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to compare the differences in disease-free survival (DFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) between the TB groups. Univariable Cox regression analysis was performed to identify the parameters that could affect the DFS and DSS. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed using parameters considered significant result in the univariable analysis. All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics (version 27.0; IBM Corp., New York, United States). A <italic>p</italic>-value &#x3c;0.05 was considered significant.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2-5">
<title>Research ethics</title>
<p>This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Pusan National University Hospital (approval number 2302-001-123) and performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="s3">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3-1">
<title>Clinicopathologic characteristics</title>
<p>
<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref> shows the clinicopathologic characteristics of the entire cohort of this study. This study included 219 patients with a mean age was 74.3&#xa0;years (range: 45 and 96&#xa0;years). Of the total patients, 137 (62.6%) were male and 82 (37.4%) were female. A total of 49 (22.4%) patients had iCC, while 170 (77.6%) had eCC. Forty-four (20.1%), 138 (63.0%), and 37 (16.9%) patients had well, moderately, and poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas, respectively. Lymphatic, venous, and perineural invasions were identified in 81 (37.9%), 103 (47.0%), and 172 (78.5%) patients, respectively. A total of 97 (44.3%) patients underwent R0 resection. A total of 66 (30.1%) patients had the T1 category, 93 (42.5%) with the T2 category, 57 (26.0%) with the T3 category, and 3 (1.4%) with the T4 category. N0, N1, and N2 categories were identified in 147 (67.1%), 53 (24.2%), and 19 (8.7%) patients, respectively. According to the AJCC staging system, 53 (24.2%) patients had stage I CC, 121 (55.3%) had stage II CC, 40 (18.3%) had stage III CC, and 5 (2.3%) had stage IV CC.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Clinicopathological characteristics.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">Parameter</th>
<th align="left">N &#x3d; 219</th>
<th align="left">%</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td align="left">Age (mean; range) (yr)</td>
<td align="left">74.3; 45&#x2013;96</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;&#x3c; 60</td>
<td align="left">17</td>
<td align="left">7.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;&#x2267; 60</td>
<td align="left">202</td>
<td align="left">92.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" align="left">Sex</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Male</td>
<td align="left">137</td>
<td align="left">62.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Female</td>
<td align="left">82</td>
<td align="left">37.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" align="left">Location</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Intrahepatic</td>
<td align="left">49</td>
<td align="left">22.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Extrahepatic</td>
<td align="left">170</td>
<td align="left">77.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Size (mean; range) (mm)</td>
<td align="left">37.21; 3&#x2013;152</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;&#x3c;50</td>
<td align="left">174</td>
<td align="left">79.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;&#x2267;50</td>
<td align="left">45</td>
<td align="left">20.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" align="left">Grade</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Well differentiated</td>
<td align="left">44</td>
<td align="left">20.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Moderately differentiated</td>
<td align="left">138</td>
<td align="left">63.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Poorly differentiated</td>
<td align="left">37</td>
<td align="left">16.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" align="left">Lymphatic invasion</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;No</td>
<td align="left">136</td>
<td align="left">62.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Yes</td>
<td align="left">81</td>
<td align="left">37.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" align="left">Venous invasion</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;No</td>
<td align="left">116</td>
<td align="left">53.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Yes</td>
<td align="left">103</td>
<td align="left">47.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" align="left">Perineural invasion</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;No</td>
<td align="left">47</td>
<td align="left">21.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Yes</td>
<td align="left">172</td>
<td align="left">78.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" align="left">Resection marginal status</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Negative (R0)</td>
<td align="left">97</td>
<td align="left">44.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Positive (R1 or R2)</td>
<td align="left">122</td>
<td align="left">55.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" align="left">Tumor budding</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Low (0&#x2013;4)</td>
<td align="left">135</td>
<td align="left">61.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Intermediate (5&#x2013;9)</td>
<td align="left">63</td>
<td align="left">28.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;High (&#x2265;10)</td>
<td align="left">21</td>
<td align="left">9.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" align="left">T category</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;1</td>
<td align="left">66</td>
<td align="left">30.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;2</td>
<td align="left">93</td>
<td align="left">42.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;3</td>
<td align="left">57</td>
<td align="left">26.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;4</td>
<td align="left">3</td>
<td align="left">1.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" align="left">N category</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;0</td>
<td align="left">147</td>
<td align="left">67.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;1</td>
<td align="left">53</td>
<td align="left">24.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;2</td>
<td align="left">19</td>
<td align="left">8.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" align="left">Overall stage</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;I</td>
<td align="left">53</td>
<td align="left">24.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;II</td>
<td align="left">121</td>
<td align="left">55.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;III</td>
<td align="left">40</td>
<td align="left">18.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;IV</td>
<td align="left">5</td>
<td align="left">2.3</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-2">
<title>Tumor budding</title>
<p>TB was not observed in 41 patients. At least one tumor bud was observed in 178 patients. Based on the ITBCC scoring system, 135 (61.6%), 63 (28.8%), and 21 (9.6%) patients had low, intermediate, and high TB, respectively. According to the TB classification for statistical analysis, the lower and higher TB groups were 198 (90.4%) and 21 (9.6%) patients. The typical findings are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref>.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Microscopic findings of low <bold>(A)</bold> and high <bold>(B)</bold> tumor buddings (Hematoxylin-eosin, &#xd7;200, arrow: tumor budding).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="pore-29-1611216-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-3">
<title>Association between tumor budding and other parameters</title>
<p>The correlations between TB and clinicopathological parameters are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>. Higher TB was associated with higher tumor grade (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.001), lymphatic invasion (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.017), and higher N category (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.034). In patients who had venous and perineural invasion, a higher TB tended to be more prevalent, but the difference was not significant (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.058 and 0.050, respectively). Age, sex, tumor location, size, resection marginal status, T category, and the overall stage had no correlation with TB.</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Association between tumor budding and clinicopathological parameters.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left">Parameter</th>
<th align="left">Lower TB<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn1">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref> (%) (<italic>n</italic> &#x3d; 198, 90.4%)</th>
<th align="left">Higher TB (%) (<italic>n</italic> &#x3d; 21, 9.6%)</th>
<th align="left">
<italic>p</italic>-value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td colspan="4" align="left">Age (mean; range) (yr)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;&#x3c;60</td>
<td align="left">15 (88.2)</td>
<td align="left">2 (11.8)</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.670</italic>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;&#x2267;60</td>
<td align="left">183 (90.6)</td>
<td align="left">19 (9.4)</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Sex</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.095</italic>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Male</td>
<td align="left">120 (87.6)</td>
<td align="left">17 (12.4)</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Female</td>
<td align="left">78 (95.1)</td>
<td align="left">4 (4.9)</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Location</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.423</italic>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Intrahepatic</td>
<td align="left">46 (93.9)</td>
<td align="left">3 (6.1)</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Extrahepatic</td>
<td align="left">152 (89.4)</td>
<td align="left">18 (10.6)</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Size (mean; range) (mm)</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">0.228</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;&#x3c;50</td>
<td align="left">155 (91.7)</td>
<td align="left">14 (8.3)</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;&#x2267;50</td>
<td align="left">43 (86.0)</td>
<td align="left">7 (14.0)</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Grade</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.001&#x2a;</italic>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Well differentiated</td>
<td align="left">44 (100.0)</td>
<td align="left">0 (0.0)</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Moderately differentiated</td>
<td align="left">126 (91.3)</td>
<td align="left">12 (8.7)</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Poorly differentiated</td>
<td align="left">28 (75.7)</td>
<td align="left">9 (24.3)</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Lymphatic invasion</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.017&#x2a;</italic>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;No</td>
<td align="left">128 (94.1)</td>
<td align="left">8 (5.9)</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Yes</td>
<td align="left">70 (84.3)</td>
<td align="left">13 (15.7)</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Venous invasion</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.058</italic>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;No</td>
<td align="left">109 (94.0)</td>
<td align="left">7 (6.0)</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Yes</td>
<td align="left">89 (86.4)</td>
<td align="left">14 (13.6)</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Perineural invasion</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.052</italic>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;No</td>
<td align="left">46 (97.9)</td>
<td align="left">1 (2.1)</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Yes</td>
<td align="left">152 (88.4)</td>
<td align="left">20 (11.6)</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Resection marginal status</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.127</italic>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Negative (R0)</td>
<td align="left">91 (93.8)</td>
<td align="left">6 (6.2)</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Positive (R1 or R2)</td>
<td align="left">107 (87.7)</td>
<td align="left">15 (12.3)</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">T category</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.505</italic>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;1</td>
<td align="left">62 (93.9)</td>
<td align="left">4 (6.1)</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;2</td>
<td align="left">84 (90.3)</td>
<td align="left">9 (9.7)</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;3</td>
<td align="left">49 (86.0)</td>
<td align="left">8 (14.0)</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;4</td>
<td align="left">3 (100.0)</td>
<td align="left">0 (0.0)</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">N category</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.034&#x2a;</italic>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;0</td>
<td align="left">138 (93.9)</td>
<td align="left">9 (6.1)</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;1</td>
<td align="left">45 (84.9)</td>
<td align="left">8 (15.1)</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;2</td>
<td align="left">15 (78.9)</td>
<td align="left">4 (21.1)</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Overall stage</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.130</italic>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;I</td>
<td align="left">50 (94.3)</td>
<td align="left">3 (5.7)</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;II</td>
<td align="left">108 (89.3)</td>
<td align="left">13 (10.7)</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;III</td>
<td align="left">37 (92.5)</td>
<td align="left">3 (7.5)</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;IV</td>
<td align="left">3 (60.0)</td>
<td align="left">2 (40.0)</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="Tfn1">
<label>
<sup>a</sup>
</label>
<p>Tumor budding.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-4">
<title>Survival according to tumor budding</title>
<p>Among the patients with R0 resection, the higher TB group had shorter DSS (<italic>p</italic> &#x3c; 0.001) compared with that in the lower TB groups. In the entire cohort, the higher TB patients had shorter DFS (<italic>p</italic> &#x3d; 0.007). The Kaplan-Meier curves for DSS and DFS are presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figures 2</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>, respectively.</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Kaplan-Meier curve depicting disease-free survival according to the tumor budding status in patients with R0 resection.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="pore-29-1611216-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Kaplan-Meier curve showing disease-specific survival according to the tumor budding status in the entire cohort.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="pore-29-1611216-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-5">
<title>Factors associated with disease-free survival</title>
<p>
<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref> shows the association between the clinicopathological parameters and DFS in 97 patients who underwent R0 resection. In the univariable analysis, poor differentiation, venous invasion, TB, advanced [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>] T category, and N category were associated with DFS. In multivariable analysis, the presence of venous invasion, and higher TB and N category were related to shorter DFS.</p>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>TABLE 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Factors associated with disease-free survival in patients with R0 resection.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left"/>
<th colspan="3" align="left">Univariable analysis</th>
<th colspan="4" align="left">Multivariable analysis</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="left"/>
<th align="left">HR<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn2">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</th>
<th align="left">95% CI<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn3">
<sup>b</sup>
</xref>
</th>
<th align="left">
<italic>p</italic>-value</th>
<th align="left">HR</th>
<th colspan="2" align="left">95% CI</th>
<th align="left">
<italic>p-</italic>value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td colspan="8" align="left">Age (yr)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;(&#x3c;60/&#x2267;60)</td>
<td align="left">1.148</td>
<td align="left">0.271&#x2013;4.861</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.851</italic>
</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td colspan="2" align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="8" align="left">Sex</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;(male/female)</td>
<td align="left">0.977</td>
<td align="left">0.428&#x2013;2.230</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.955</italic>
</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td colspan="2" align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="8" align="left">Location</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;(intra-/extra-hepatic)</td>
<td align="left">1.601</td>
<td align="left">0.679&#x2013;3.775</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.282</italic>
</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td colspan="2" align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="8" align="left">Size</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;(&#x3c;50/&#x2267;50)</td>
<td align="left">2.048</td>
<td align="left">0.861&#x2013;4.871</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.098</italic>
</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td colspan="2" align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="8" align="left">Grade</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Well differentiated</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Reference</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Reference</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Moderately differentiated</td>
<td align="left">1.547</td>
<td align="left">0.522&#x2013;4.588</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.431</italic>
</td>
<td align="left">0.723</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">0.217&#x2013;2.412</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.598</italic>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Poorly differentiated</td>
<td align="left">3.993</td>
<td align="left">1.099&#x2013;14.508</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.035&#x2a;</italic>
</td>
<td align="left">1.802</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">0.420&#x2013;7.727</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.428</italic>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="8" align="left">Lymphatic invasion</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;(no/yes)</td>
<td align="left">1.927</td>
<td align="left">0.881&#x2013;4.213</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.095</italic>
</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td colspan="2" align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="8" align="left">Venous invasion</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;(no/yes)</td>
<td align="left">3.989</td>
<td align="left">1.829&#x2013;8.700</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>&#x3c;0.001&#x2a;</italic>
</td>
<td align="left">2.887</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">1.259&#x2013;6.621</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.012&#x2a;</italic>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="8" align="left">Perineural invasion</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;(no/yes)</td>
<td align="left">1.302</td>
<td align="left">0.587&#x2013;2.884</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.515</italic>
</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td colspan="2" align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="8" align="left">Tumor budding</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;(lower/higher)</td>
<td align="left">5.755</td>
<td align="left">2.133&#x2013;15.529</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>&#x3c;0.001&#x2a;</italic>
</td>
<td align="left">3.969</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">1.375&#x2013;11.455</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.011&#x2a;</italic>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="8" align="left">T category</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;1</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Reference</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Reference</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;2</td>
<td align="left">1.936</td>
<td align="left">0.798&#x2013;4.698</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.144</italic>
</td>
<td align="left">1.229</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">0.463&#x2013;3.261</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.679</italic>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;3&#x2013;4</td>
<td align="left">2.712</td>
<td align="left">1.018&#x2013;7.228</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.046&#x2a;</italic>
</td>
<td align="left">1.076</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">0.301&#x2013;3.843</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.910</italic>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="8" align="left">N category</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;0</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Reference</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td colspan="3" align="left">Reference</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;1</td>
<td align="left">3.379</td>
<td align="left">1.387&#x2013;8.237</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.007&#x2a;</italic>
</td>
<td align="left">2.635</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">1.045&#x2013;6.647</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.040&#x2a;</italic>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;2</td>
<td align="left">4.040</td>
<td align="left">1.158&#x2013;14.090</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.028&#x2a;</italic>
</td>
<td align="left">4.440</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">1.234&#x2013;15.970</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.022&#x2a;</italic>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="8" align="left">Overall stage</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;I</td>
<td align="left">Reference</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td colspan="2" align="left"/>
<td colspan="2" align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;II</td>
<td align="left">2.174</td>
<td align="left">0.927&#x2013;5.101</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.074</italic>
</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td colspan="2" align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;III&#x2013;IV</td>
<td align="left">3.116</td>
<td align="left">0.795&#x2013;12.220</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.103</italic>
</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td colspan="2" align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="Tfn2">
<label>
<sup>a</sup>
</label>
<p>Hazard ratio.</p>
</fn>
<fn id="Tfn3">
<label>
<sup>b</sup>
</label>
<p>Confidence interval.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3-6">
<title>Factors associated with disease-specific survival</title>
<p>
<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">Table 4</xref> presents the association between the clinicopathological parameters and DSS in all 219 patients. In the univariable analysis, lymphatic, venous, and perineural invasion status; resection marginal status; TB; and T and N categories and overall stages were correlated with DSS<bold>.</bold> In the multivariable analysis, positive resection marginal status and higher T category were associated with shorter DSS. However, TB was not correlated with DSS in the multivariable analysis.</p>
<table-wrap id="T4" position="float">
<label>TABLE 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Factors associated with disease-specific survival.</p>
</caption>
<table>
<thead valign="top">
<tr>
<th align="left"/>
<th colspan="3" align="left">Univariable analysis</th>
<th colspan="3" align="left">Multivariable analysis</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="left"/>
<th align="left">HR<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn4">
<sup>a</sup>
</xref>
</th>
<th align="left">95% CI<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="Tfn5">
<sup>b</sup>
</xref>
</th>
<th align="left">
<italic>p-</italic>value</th>
<th align="left">HR</th>
<th align="left">95% CI</th>
<th align="left">
<italic>p-</italic>value</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody valign="top">
<tr>
<td colspan="7" align="left">Age (yr)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;(&#x3c;60/&#x2267;60)</td>
<td align="left">0.538</td>
<td align="left">0.223&#x2013;1.300</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.162</italic>
</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="7" align="left">Sex</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;(male/female)</td>
<td align="left">0.892</td>
<td align="left">0.462&#x2013;1.724</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.734</italic>
</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="7" align="left">Location</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;(intra-/extra-hepatic)</td>
<td align="left">1.107</td>
<td align="left">0.486&#x2013;2.525</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.808</italic>
</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="7" align="left">Size</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;(&#x3c;50/&#x2267;50)</td>
<td align="left">1.201</td>
<td align="left">0.592&#x2013;2.437</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.611</italic>
</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="7" align="left">Grade</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Well differentiated</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Reference</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Moderately differentiated</td>
<td align="left">1.108</td>
<td align="left">0.490&#x2013;2.509</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.805</italic>
</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;Poorly differentiated</td>
<td align="left">2.249</td>
<td align="left">0.835&#x2013;6.060</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.109</italic>
</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="7" align="left">Lymphatic invasion</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;(no/yes)</td>
<td align="left">2.493</td>
<td align="left">1.287&#x2013;4.829</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.005&#x2a;</italic>
</td>
<td align="left">1.175</td>
<td align="left">0.423&#x2013;3.266</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.757</italic>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="7" align="left">Venous invasion</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;(no/yes)</td>
<td align="left">4.246</td>
<td align="left">2.032&#x2013;8.875</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>&#x3c;0.001&#x2a;</italic>
</td>
<td align="left">1.947</td>
<td align="left">0.820&#x2013;4.624</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.131</italic>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="7" align="left">Perineural invasion</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;(no/yes)</td>
<td align="left">5.115</td>
<td align="left">1.566&#x2013;16.707</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.003&#x2a;</italic>
</td>
<td align="left">0.713</td>
<td align="left">0.169&#x2013;3.014</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.645</italic>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="7" align="left">Resection marginal status</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;(negative/positive)</td>
<td align="left">6.926</td>
<td align="left">2.684&#x2013;17.857</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.000&#x2a;</italic>
</td>
<td align="left">4.893</td>
<td align="left">1.613&#x2013;15.092</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.002&#x2a;</italic>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="7" align="left">Tumor budding</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;(lower/higher)</td>
<td align="left">3.134</td>
<td align="left">1.291&#x2013;7.608</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.008&#x2a;</italic>
</td>
<td align="left">1.428</td>
<td align="left">0.494&#x2013;4.128</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.511</italic>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="7" align="left">T category</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;1</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Reference</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Reference</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;2</td>
<td align="left">3.126</td>
<td align="left">1.044&#x2013;9.356</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.042&#x2a;</italic>
</td>
<td align="left">3.374</td>
<td align="left">1.061&#x2013;10.737</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.039&#x2a;</italic>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;3&#x2013;4</td>
<td align="left">7.229</td>
<td align="left">2.414&#x2013;21.652</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>&#x3c;0.001&#x2a;</italic>
</td>
<td align="left">5.262</td>
<td align="left">1.618&#x2013;17.112</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.006&#x2a;</italic>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="7" align="left">N category</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;0</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Reference</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Reference</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;1</td>
<td align="left">3.462</td>
<td align="left">1.668&#x2013;7.187</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.001&#x2a;</italic>
</td>
<td align="left">1.670</td>
<td align="left">0.733&#x2013;3.807</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.222</italic>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;2</td>
<td align="left">9.629</td>
<td align="left">3.750&#x2013;24.725</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>&#x3c;0.001&#x2a;</italic>
</td>
<td align="left">6.667</td>
<td align="left">2.284&#x2013;19.461</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.001&#x2a;</italic>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="7" align="left">Overall stage</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;I</td>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Reference</td>
<td align="left"/>
<td colspan="2" align="left">Reference</td>
<td align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;II</td>
<td align="left">9.076</td>
<td align="left">1.217&#x2013;67.697</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.031&#x2a;</italic>
</td>
<td align="left">2.262</td>
<td align="left">0.159&#x2013;32.243</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.547</italic>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">&#x2003;III&#x2013;IV</td>
<td align="left">28.414</td>
<td align="left">3.659&#x2013;218.591</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.001&#x2a;</italic>
</td>
<td align="left">2.740</td>
<td align="left">0.173&#x2013;43.473</td>
<td align="left">
<italic>0.475</italic>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="Tfn4">
<label>
<sup>a</sup>
</label>
<p>Hazard ratio.</p>
</fn>
<fn id="Tfn5">
<label>
<sup>b</sup>
</label>
<p>Confidence interval.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="s4">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Our findings suggested that a higher TB was related to factors indicating aggressiveness, such as lymphatic invasion, higher tumor grade, and higher N category. In patients who underwent R0 resection, the higher TB group showed a shorter DFS compared with that of the lower TB group.</p>
<p>TB is an EMT phenotype. Anchorage-dependent cells undergo a programmed cell death process, called anoikis, when separated from the surrounding extracellular matrix. EMT provides the characteristics of stem cells, while destroying the intercellular junctions and avoiding anoikis in the tumor microenvironment, thus resulting in the acquisition of mobility and invasive phenotypes. TB cells in colorectal and gastric cancers overexpress tyrosine kinase receptor B (TrkB), an indicator of anoikis resistance, which allows TB cells to survive [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">21</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>]. Surviving TB cells are inevitably associated with invasiveness. Microscopically, TB cells are often observed near the lymphatic or blood vessels, which suggests the possibility of intravasation and spreading to distant tissues [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">22</xref>]. Lugli et al. suggested that TB is a good indicator of aggressiveness in rectal cancer, demonstrating that it is associated with the number of involved nodes, extramural spread, lymphocytic infiltration, and tumor differentiation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>]. Okudo et al. reported that TB occurs more frequently observed in the cases of poor differentiation at the invasive front of biliary tract cancer [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>]. Agostini-Vulaj et al. also reported that TB is associated with high tumor grade, lymphovascular invasion, and perineural invasion in iCC and eCCs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>]. In this study, TB was significantly associated with lymphatic invasion, and higher tumor grade and N category. Higher TB was associated with the presence of venous and perineural invasion but did not show statistical significance in this study.</p>
<p>Okudo et al. are the first team to evaluate the prognostic impact of TB in the CC [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">16</xref>]. They demonstrated that the &#x2267;5&#xa0;TB foci were as an independent predictor in overall survival. Ogino et al. also reported that patients with perihilar and distal duct CC who had a high TB grade had a short postoperative overall survival [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>]. Ito et al. reported that high TB was correlated with poor DSS in patients with perihilar CC; moreover, the DSS rate in the high TB group was similar to that of the group without resection [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>]. In this study, DSS was not correlated with TB in the entire cohort. However, the DFS was significantly associated with TB in patients who underwent R0 resection.</p>
<p>All studies investigating TB in patients with CC published thus far graded the TB based on ITBCC scoring system [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">17</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">19</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">23</xref>]. Most of these studies classified TB into low and intermediate/high groups based on the cut-off value of 5 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">12</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">14</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">18</xref>]. Conversely, Kosaka et al. reported a difference in the survival outcomes between low/intermediate and high TB groups, using a cut-off value of 10 in their multicenter study [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">13</xref>]. As in Kosaka&#x2019;s study, we divided patients with TB into low/intermediate and high groups. Findings from previous studies and the present study suggest that the ITBCC method is appropriate for TB cell counting in cholangiocarcinoma. Higher TB levels were correlated with worse survival. However, few studies had revealed the correlation between TB and survival when patients with TB were divided into three groups according to the ITBCC scoring system. Previous studies had demonstrated a good correlation with survival when TB was divided into two groups based on a cut-off value of 5 or 10. Therefore, for CC, further investigation is required to confirm whether the ITBCC scoring system should be applied as it is or whether a revised system should be established.</p>
<p>Recently, Zlobec et al. proposed the revised ITBCC scoring system [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">24</xref>]. They reported that dividing TB into four categories, including &#x201c;zero-buds,&#x201d; is more informative on tumor behavior than the previous ITBCC scoring system. This study included 41 (18.7%) patients with zero buds. However, in this study, there was no difference between DFS and DSS in the zero-buds and lower-TB (1&#x2013;9) groups (<xref ref-type="sec" rid="s10">Supplementary Material S1</xref>).</p>
<p>Ogino et al. reported differences in prognostic stratification with TB in perihilar CC and distal CC [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">15</xref>]. These differences were in term of anatomical location and histological characteristics; for example, the connective tissue surrounding the proximal bile duct is less dense than the distal bile duct. On the contrary, Agostini-Vulaj et al. reported that TB occurred more in eCC than iCC [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">11</xref>]. In this study, there was no difference in the frequency of TB according to the anatomical location. Therefore, one cannot conclude on the difference in the frequency of TB.</p>
<p>This study has several limitations. First, we investigated the eCC and iCC, including large- and small-duct types. CCs may have varying carcinogenic mechanisms depending on their location. Particularly, in iCC, the large duct type is similar to perihilar CC, while the small duct type is similar to the adenocarcinoma component of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma. However, considering these differences, the number of cases in each location was insufficient to conduct this study according to the tumor location. Second, patients who had incomplete resection accounted for over half of the cohort in this study. Therefore, the data used for analyzing the DFS were limited. Hence, further investigations are required to address these limitations.</p>
<p>In conclusion, our findings suggested that higher TB levels in patients with CC are associated with aggressiveness and worse DFS. Moreover, TB may have prognostic implications in CC.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s5">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The raw data supporting the conclusion of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6">
<title>Ethics statement</title>
<p>The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Pusan National University Hospital (approval number 2302-001-123). The patients/participants or their legal guardian/next of kin provided written informed consent to participate in this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>Conceptualization: JA. Data curation: SK, SL, YL, and SP. Formal analysis: KK and JA. Funding acquisition: JA. Investigation: KK and JA. Methodology: KK, JA, and AK. Project administration: JA, AK, and KC. Resources: AK, KC, CL, and GH. Software: SK. Supervision: AK and KC. Validation: KK, JA, and AK. Visualization: KK and JA. Writing-original draft: KK. Writing-review and editing: JA. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This study was supported by Biomedical Research Institute Grant (202300130001), Pusan National University Hospital.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="s9">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.por-journal.com/articles/10.3389/pore.2023.1611216/full#supplementary-material">https://www.por-journal.com/articles/10.3389/pore.2023.1611216/full&#x23;supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet1.docx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/docx" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<label>1.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Khan</surname>
<given-names>SA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tavolari</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brandi</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Cholangiocarcinoma: Epidemiology and risk factors</article-title>. <source>Liver Int</source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>39</volume>:<fpage>19</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>31</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/liv.14095</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<label>2.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Khan</surname>
<given-names>AS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dageforde</surname>
<given-names>LA</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Cholangiocarcinoma</article-title>. <source>Surg Clin North Am</source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>99</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>315</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>35</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.suc.2018.12.004</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<label>3.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ueno</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Murphy</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jass</surname>
<given-names>JR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mochizuki</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Talbot</surname>
<given-names>IC</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Tumour &#x27;budding&#x27; as an index to estimate the potential of aggressiveness in rectal cancer</article-title>. <source>Histopathology</source> (<year>2002</year>) <volume>40</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>127</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>32</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-2559.2002.01324.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<label>4.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Imai</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>The growth of human carcinoma: A morphological analysis</article-title>. <source>Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi</source> (<year>1954</year>) <volume>45</volume>:<fpage>72</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>102</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<label>5.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>De Smedt</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Palmans</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sagaert</surname>
<given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Tumour budding in colorectal cancer: What do we know and what can we do?</article-title> <source>Virchows Arch</source> (<year>2016</year>) <volume>468</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<fpage>397</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>408</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00428-015-1886-5</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<label>6.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lugli</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kirsch</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ajioka</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bosman</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cathomas</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dawson</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Recommendations for reporting tumor budding in colorectal cancer based on the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) 2016</article-title>. <source>Mod Pathol</source> (<year>2017</year>) <volume>30</volume>(<issue>9</issue>):<fpage>1299</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>311</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/modpathol.2017.46</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<label>7.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Karamitopoulou</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wartenberg</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zlobec</surname>
<given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cibin</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Worni</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gloor</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Tumour budding in pancreatic cancer revisited: Validation of the ITBCC scoring system</article-title>. <source>Histopathology</source> (<year>2018</year>) <volume>73</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>137</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>46</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/his.13508</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<label>8.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname>
<given-names>HN</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname>
<given-names>SY</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname>
<given-names>BH</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname>
<given-names>CY</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Prognostic value of tumor budding in gallbladder cancer: Application of the international tumor budding consensus conference scoring system</article-title>. <source>Virchows Arch</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>478</volume>(<issue>6</issue>):<fpage>1071</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00428-020-03012-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<label>9.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lohneis</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hieggelke</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gebauer</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ball</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bruns</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>B&#xfc;ttner</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Tumor budding assessed according to the criteria of the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference determines prognosis in resected esophageal adenocarcinoma</article-title>. <source>Virchows Arch</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>478</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>393</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>400</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00428-020-02897-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<label>10.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Szalai</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jakab</surname>
<given-names>&#xc1;</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kocsm&#xe1;r</surname>
<given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Szirtes</surname>
<given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kenessey</surname>
<given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Szij&#xe1;rt&#xf3;</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Prognostic ability of tumor budding outperforms poorly differentiated clusters in gastric cancer</article-title>. <source>Cancers (Basel)</source> (<year>2022</year>) <volume>14</volume>(<issue>19</issue>):<fpage>4731</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/cancers14194731</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<label>11.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Agostini-Vulaj</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cates</surname>
<given-names>JMM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bratton</surname>
<given-names>LE</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gonzalez</surname>
<given-names>RS</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Increasing tumor budding in cholangiocarcinoma is associated with decreased disease-specific survival</article-title>. <source>Hum Pathol</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>111</volume>:<fpage>75</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>83</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.humpath.2021.03.004</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<label>12.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ito</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuriyama</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kozuka</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Komatsubara</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ichikawa</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Noguchi</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>High tumor budding is a strong predictor of poor prognosis in the resected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma patients regardless of neoadjuvant therapy, showing survival similar to those without resection</article-title>. <source>BMC Cancer</source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>20</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>209</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12885-020-6695-9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<label>13.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kosaka</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ishida</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ueno</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Komeda</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hokutou</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Iida</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Tumor budding may be a promising prognostic indicator in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A multicenter retrospective study</article-title>. <source>Ann Gastroenterol Surg</source> (<year>2023</year>) <volume>7</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>138</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>46</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ags3.12605</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<label>14.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nakayama</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hisaka</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sakai</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Akashi</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yuichi</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sato</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Tumour budding as an independent prognostic factor for survival in patients with distal bile duct cancer</article-title>. <source>Anticancer Res</source> (<year>2022</year>) <volume>42</volume>(<issue>8</issue>):<fpage>4079</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>87</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21873/anticanres.15905</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<label>15.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ogino</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nakanishi</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mitsuhashi</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hatanaka</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Amano</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Marukawa</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Impact of tumour budding grade in 310 patients who underwent surgical resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma</article-title>. <source>Histopathology</source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>74</volume>(<issue>6</issue>):<fpage>861</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>72</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/his.13827</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<label>16.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Okubo</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mitsunaga</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kato</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kojima</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sugimoto</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gotohda</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>The prognostic impact of differentiation at the invasive front of biliary tract cancer</article-title>. <source>J Surg Oncol</source> (<year>2018</year>) <volume>117</volume>(<issue>6</issue>):<fpage>1278</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>87</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jso.24946</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<label>17.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Regmi</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Paudyal</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Paudyal</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname>
<given-names>HJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname>
<given-names>WJ</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Prognostic significance of tumor budding in biliary tract cancer</article-title>. <source>Eur J Surg Oncol</source> (<year>2022</year>) <volume>48</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<fpage>160</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ejso.2021.08.008</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<label>18.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tanaka</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yamauchi</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ushiku</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shibahara</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hayashi</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Misumi</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Tumor budding in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A predictor of postsurgery outcomes</article-title>. <source>Am J Surg Pathol</source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>43</volume>(<issue>9</issue>):<fpage>1180</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>90</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/PAS.0000000000001332</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<label>19.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yoshizawa</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hong</surname>
<given-names>SM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jung</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>No&#xeb;</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kiemen</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>PH</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Three-dimensional analysis of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and tumor budding</article-title>. <source>J Pathol</source> (<year>2020</year>) <volume>251</volume>(<issue>4</issue>):<fpage>400</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>10</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/path.5474</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<label>20.</label>
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Amin</surname>
<given-names>MB</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Edge</surname>
<given-names>SB</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Greene</surname>
<given-names>FL</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Byrd</surname>
<given-names>DR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brookland</surname>
<given-names>RK</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Washington</surname>
<given-names>MK</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <source>AJCC cancer staging manual</source>. <edition>8th ed.</edition> <publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name> (<year>2017</year>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<label>21.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cao</surname>
<given-names>Z</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Livas</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kyprianou</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Anoikis and EMT: Lethal "liaisons" during cancer progression</article-title>. <source>Crit Rev Oncog</source> (<year>2016</year>) <volume>21</volume>(<issue>3-4</issue>):<fpage>155</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>68</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1615/CritRevOncog.2016016955</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<label>22.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lugli</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zlobec</surname>
<given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Berger</surname>
<given-names>MD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kirsch</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nagtegaal</surname>
<given-names>ID</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. <article-title>Tumour budding in solid cancers</article-title>. <source>Nat Rev Clin Oncol</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>18</volume>(<issue>2</issue>):<fpage>101</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>15</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41571-020-0422-y</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<label>23.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tanaka</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kunita</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yamagishi</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Katoh</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ishikawa</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yamamoto</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>KRAS mutation in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Linkage with metastasis-free survival and reduced E-cadherin expression</article-title>. <source>Liver Int</source> (<year>2022</year>) <volume>42</volume>(<issue>10</issue>):<fpage>2329</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>40</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/liv.15366</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<label>24.</label>
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zlobec</surname>
<given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>B&#xe4;chli</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Galuppini</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Berger</surname>
<given-names>MD</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dawson</surname>
<given-names>HE</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nagtegaal</surname>
<given-names>ID</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> <article-title>Refining the ITBCC tumor budding scoring system with a "zero-budding" category in colorectal cancer</article-title>. <source>Virchows Arch</source> (<year>2021</year>) <volume>479</volume>(<issue>6</issue>):<fpage>1085</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>90</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00428-021-03090-w</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>